straw poll: please indicate your current assessment of the

robert bristow-johnson

<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no,location=no, scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>\nThere is an article about the "Bogdanov Affair" in Wikipedia\nhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogdanov_Affair .\n\nof course the Bogdanoff\'s brothers have gotten involved to protect their\nreputation. while some consensus has been achieved there might be some\nremaining dispute to what the objective measure of opinion of the existing\nphysics community competent in the field is of their published papers.\n\nplease can all of you that consider yourselves competent in the subject\nmatter indicate your assessment?\n\nmay i suggest choosing from:\n\na) Brilliant and novel contribution to the body of knowledge. Possible\nNobel material.\n\nb) Novel contribution to the body of knowledge with some ideas not proven or\nprovable. (perhaps "Protoscienc"?)\n\nc) Run of the mill work. Nothing spectacular, nothing particularly\ncontroversial.\n\nd) Possibly having value, but plagued with numerous errors.\n\ne) Pseudoscience or quackery or hoax. How did these guys ever get their\nPh.D.s based on this?\n\nf) Add your own comment.\n\n\n\n--\n\nr b-j rbj@audioimagination.com\n\n"Imagination is more important than knowledge."\n\n\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form">  View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>There is an article about the "Bogdanov Affair" in Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogdanov_Affair .

of course the Bogdanoff's brothers have gotten involved to protect their
reputation. while some consensus has been achieved there might be some
remaining dispute to what the objective measure of opinion of the existing
physics community competent in the field is of their published papers.

please can all of you that consider yourselves competent in the subject
matter indicate your assessment?

may i suggest choosing from:

a) Brilliant and novel contribution to the body of knowledge. Possible
Nobel material.

b) Novel contribution to the body of knowledge with some ideas not proven or
provable. (perhaps "Protoscienc"?)

c) Run of the mill work. Nothing spectacular, nothing particularly
controversial.

d) Possibly having value, but plagued with numerous errors.

e) Pseudoscience or quackery or hoax. How did these guys ever get their
Ph.D.s based on this?

f) Add your own comment.

--

[itex]r b-j[/itex] rbj@audioimagination.com

"Imagination is more important than knowledge."

Similar Threads for: straw poll: please indicate your current assessment of the
Thread	Forum	Replies
straw poll: please indicate your current assessment of the	General Physics	0