Thread Closed

Acceleration vs. Time

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Sep10-05, 03:29 PM   #1
 

Acceleration vs. Time


Ok here's the graph:

http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/8762/acvt9nz.jpg

We are given that the particle starts from rest at the initial position 0m with the initial velocity 0m/s. I need to find what the position of the particle is at t=5s.

Since acceleration is changing here, I didn't know what to do so I broke the problem up. First, I wanted to find the position at t=3s. I used the equation
x = x0 + v0t + 1/2at^2 where x0 = 0m, v0 = 0m/s, a = 1m/s^2, and t = 3s.
I came up with 4.5m.

Next, I did the same thing for the lower part; I used the same equation but with x0 = 4.5m, v0 = 3m/s, a = -2m/s^2, and t = 2s. I came up with 6.5m and added it to first distance (4.5m) to get 11m.

Obviously this is wrong. Any help you can provide would be much appreciated. Thank you.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Bird's playlist could signal mental strengths and weaknesses
>> Minus environment, patterns still emerge: Computational study tracks E. coli cells' regulatory mechanisms
>> Bacterium uses natural 'thermometer' to trigger diarrheal disease, scientists find
Sep10-05, 03:58 PM   #2
 
Quote by onetroubledguy
Ok here's the graph:

http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/8762/acvt9nz.jpg

We are given that the particle starts from rest at the initial position 0m with the initial velocity 0m/s. I need to find what the position of the particle is at t=5s.

Since acceleration is changing here, I didn't know what to do so I broke the problem up. First, I wanted to find the position at t=3s. I used the equation
x = x0 + v0t + 1/2at^2 where x0 = 0m, v0 = 0m/s, a = 1m/s^2, and t = 3s.
I came up with 4.5m.

Next, I did the same thing for the lower part; I used the same equation but with x0 = 4.5m, v0 = 3m/s, a = -2m/s^2, and t = 2s. I came up with 6.5m and added it to first distance (4.5m) to get 11m.

Obviously this is wrong. Any help you can provide would be much appreciated. Thank you.

wouldn't it be just the answer to your second part? you're starting at the point where the first part left off. you don't need to add that onto your answer as you've already accouned for the position up to 3 seconds with the [tex]x_0[/tex] in your second kinematic eqation.
Sep10-05, 03:59 PM   #3
 
your individual calculations are correct. However, you have to be careful of the SIGN of the acceleration in each part. What is the acceleration (as read fro mteh graph) for the first 3 seconds and then the final 2 seconds?
Sep10-05, 05:46 PM   #4
 

Acceleration vs. Time


Quote by teclo
wouldn't it be just the answer to your second part? you're starting at the point where the first part left off. you don't need to add that onto your answer as you've already accouned for the position up to 3 seconds with the [tex]x_0[/tex] in your second kinematic eqation.
You're right. I always do stupid things like that! Grr...thanks.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Acceleration vs. Time
Thread Forum Replies
Time Perception Acceleration Medical Sciences 11
Time Depenent Acceleration Introductory Physics Homework 1
Distance, acceleration, and time.. Introductory Physics Homework 3
time and acceleration Special & General Relativity 25
Converting velocity/time graph to acceleration/time Introductory Physics Homework 2