Register to reply

Derivative of Piece-Wise Function

by Jeremy
Tags: derivative, function, piecewise
Share this thread:
Sep12-05, 08:20 PM
P: 24
I am doing my calculus homework and two problems are holding me up.

The first says:

Using one-sided derivatives, show that the function f(x) =

x^3, x_<_1
3x, x>1

does not have a derivative at x=1

Now it is painfully obvious that the function is not continuous at x=1. however, i am not entirely sure that is the answer that the book wants. the slopes from both sides seem to be 3, so how can it not have a derivative (aside from the continuity issue)? A similar (but with continuity) problem follows:

Secondly (i will try to answer the ones i have gotten so far):
let f(x) =

x^2, x_<_1
2x, x>1

a) find f'(x) for x<1........................i think this is 2x
b) find f'(x) for x>1........................2
c) find lim (x-->1-) f'(x).................2
d) find lim (x-->1+) f'(x).................2
e) does lim (x-->1) f'(x) exist? explain
f) use the def to find the left-hand derivative of f at x=1 if it exists....same as (c)=2
g) use the def...right-hand deriv.....same as (d)=2
h) does f'(1) exist? explain

according to the rules of derivatives, if the left and right-hand derivatives are the same at a point, then that point has a derivative (assuming continuous). however, it seems to me that, at x=1, there would be a bit of a "jagged edge," somewhat like an absolute value point. therefore, how could a derivative be found?

thanks in advance. feel free to tell me i am horribly wrong in all aspects of my answer.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100
Sep12-05, 09:10 PM
P: 4
For the first question, an answer of it isn't differentiable because its not continuous seems to be the answer that would be appropriate to me.

2nd question, yes, it should be differentiable at f'(1). Because the slopes (derivatives) are the same at point x = 1, then it shouldn't have a "jagged egde". If it were graphed it should appear smooth, since the one sided limits of both the functions and derivatives have the same value at x=1.
Sep12-05, 09:57 PM
P: 24
sounds good

thanks a bunch

Sep13-05, 02:02 AM
HW Helper
P: 397
Derivative of Piece-Wise Function

If there is no derivative at x = 1, which there isn't, then there can be no further derivatives at x = 1. There will be a "hole" in the graph of the derivative there. Therefore, the derivative is not differentiable at x = 1, even if both the left-hand and the right-hand derivatives exist and are the same.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Finding the limit? ...Piece function, stuck. Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Continuity on a piece-wise function Calculus & Beyond Homework 7
Piece wise continuity Calculus & Beyond Homework 8
Piece wise function and Laplace Transform Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Piece-wise Function Linear & Abstract Algebra 2