Questions on kinematics (distance/velocity/acceleration)

  • Thread starter Thread starter dnt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around kinematics, specifically focusing on distance, velocity, and acceleration as derived from a time vs distance table for a ball rolling down a hill. Participants are exploring how to interpret the data and calculate specific values related to motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to determine the distance at a specific time (2.2 seconds) and questions whether to estimate from a graph or calculate directly. They also inquire about the correct method to find the slope (velocity) at 3 seconds, debating which two points to use for the calculation. Additionally, they explore the pattern in velocity changes and question if this implies a constant acceleration.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the questions raised, with some offering guidance on how to approach the calculations. There is a recognition of the need for clarity on instantaneous versus average speed, and multiple interpretations of how to calculate slope are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may not provide enough information for precise calculations of instantaneous speed, suggesting the need for a distance-time function to derive accurate values. There is also mention of the potential for polynomial fitting to improve accuracy.

dnt
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
these should be pretty simple but for some reason i can't get them.

ok they give you a basic time vs distance table:

  • 0 sec - 0 m
  • 1 sec - 2 m
  • 2 sec - 8 m
  • 3 sec - 18 m
  • 4 sec - 32 m
  • 5 sec - 50 m

its a ball rolling down a hill which makes sense for the data. now the question is what is the distance after 2.2 seconds. can you figure that out exactly or do you just look at a graph and estimate it?

second question is what is the slope at 3 seconds? now i konw slope is change in y over change in x (meaning change in distance over change in time) which is also the velocity at 3 seconds but which two points do you use? do you use the 3 second data with the 2 second data or the 3 second data with the 4 second data? they give different answers.

third, if you do look at all the differences from one second to the next, you get a patten of how much it jumps - 2, 6, 10, 14, 18 - those are the velocities at each second, right? well since it jumps by 4 each time can i then say the acceleration is 4 m/s^2?

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
s = .5at2 + v0t + s0

Plug in!
 
ok so i can do this:

s = .5(4)(2.2)^2 + (0)(2.2) + 0

is that correct?

am i right the a=4?
 
Yes, because 2=.5a -> a=4 m/s2.
 
dnt said:
these should be pretty simple but for some reason i can't get them.

ok they give you a basic time vs distance table:

  • 0 sec - 0 m
  • 1 sec - 2 m
  • 2 sec - 8 m
  • 3 sec - 18 m
  • 4 sec - 32 m
  • 5 sec - 50 m


second question is what is the slope at 3 seconds? now i konw slope is change in y over change in x (meaning change in distance over change in time) which is also the velocity at 3 seconds but which two points do you use? do you use the 3 second data with the 2 second data or the 3 second data with the 4 second data? they give different answers.
.

anyone know this question?
 
[tex]v_{f} = v_{i} + at[/tex]
 
i don't think that answers my question.

the question specifically asked for slope (which in turn, is velocity) at 3 seconds. to find slope you need two points, right? well do you use 2 and 3 seconds OR 3 and 4 seconds to find the slope at that point?
 
You are asked, apparently, for an "instantaneous" speed and you don't have enough information to do that. To find instantaneous speed (unless the distance-time graph is a line and speed is constant), you would have to know the distance-time function and you only have it at specific times. What you can do is anyone of what you are suggesting- use the distances at 3 and 4 seconds to get the "average speed between t=3 and t= 4", (32-18)/1= 14 m/s, use the distances at 2 and 3 seconds to get the "average speed between t= 2 and t= 3,(18-8)/1= 10 m/s, or even average those two answers- (10+ 14)/2= 12. For this particular problem, that turns out to be the same as if you find the "average speed between t= 2 and t= 4", symmetric about t= 3, (38- 8)/2= 24/2= 12 m/s. If you want to do a lot of work to get a very accurate answer, you might find a polynomial function that fits all of the points and differentiate that! Actually, here, it is not a "lot of work". It look pretty obvious that each distance, in m, is equal to twice the time, in s, squared: d= 2t2.
The instantaneous speed, at t= 3, is the derivative of that, 4t, evaluated at t= 3: 4(3)= 12 m/s.
Of course, that was to be expected. Something moving under gravity has a constant acceleration and so its distance function is a quadratic. That was what apmcavoy was telling you in the first reply to your post.
 
ah. thanks!
 
  • #10
Solving the slope

I don't think that you need to take the derivative especially if you are not in a calculus based physics course.
To find the slope at one point draw a tangent line. I promise there is an explantion of how to do this in your book. It should just touch the curve. The tangent line is straight so take any 2 points and find the slope.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K