Create Life from Scratch - RedNova

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    scratch
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the synthesis of life, specifically focusing on the creation of a viral genome in the laboratory. Participants explore the implications of this achievement, its comparison to previous work in molecular biology, and the potential future applications in creating engineered organisms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants compare the synthesis of a viral genome to an amateur building an automobile from blueprints and parts, emphasizing the complexity of achieving functional assembly without instructions.
  • There is mention of devices that can chemically assemble DNA fragments, with the assertion that this process is effective for viruses, as they can create proteins from valid DNA sequences.
  • A historical experiment is referenced where a dissociated virus's DNA was extracted and successfully reassembled in a sterile environment, leading to the formation of an active virus.
  • Some participants note that the recent achievement by Venter's team is a step towards replacing DNA in bacterial cells, which is considered a more complex task than synthesizing a virus.
  • There is a reference to Arthur Kornberg's earlier work on synthesizing an active viral genome, highlighting the evolution of techniques in the field of molecular biology.
  • Participants acknowledge that Venter's work represents proof of concept for synthesizing a completely artificial living organism, though the implications and future steps remain open for discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the significance and implications of the synthesis of the viral genome, with some agreeing on its importance as a proof of concept while others highlight the challenges that remain in creating more complex organisms. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the broader implications of this work.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on existing knowledge of viral DNA sequences and the unresolved complexities involved in creating engineered bacterial species from scratch.

Messages
19,917
Reaction score
10,945
http://rn01.rednova.com/news/stories/2/2003/11/13/story007.html
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
"Scratch" from "commercial" DNA and (inferred by me) a known DNA sequence for an existing/natural virus is equivalent to a complete amateur building an automobile from the blueprints and off-the-shelf parts (edit, insert) without any assembly instructions (end edit) and having it work at all, let alone safely --- not too shabby. The achievement is probably that they got everything to fold, coil, and otherwise configure itself correctly --- not obvious that they actually got it to reproduce itself --- the acid test.
 
Last edited:
They had DNA fragments, and there now exist devices capable of hooking the fragments together chemically in the right order. Since this is just a virus, the DNA if valid should by itself create the proteins. I emphasize that this only works for viruses.

Years ago an experiment was done in which a virus was dissociated in one test tube, the DNA extracted by centrifuge and inserted into another test tube which had a sterile solution of the amino acids required. The DNA quickly assembled an active virus in this strile environment. See the grand old book "The Eighth Day of Creation" for a throrough account of the early days of molecular biology.

This virus achievement is a way station of the Ventner team's progress toward their ultimate goal, to replace the DNA in a bacterial cell with different DNA of their own manufacture, thus (hopefully) creating a new, engineered, species of bacteria. That will be a bigger job than the virus.
 
I haven't had the time to look at it myself, but this is from an email someone had sent to me: Cool: The first viral genome to be totally synthesized in the lab was announced by Venter et al.

http://apnews.excite.com/article/20031113/D7UPU6G85.html

Roughly 3 decades ago, Arthur Kornberg synthesized an active viral genome using purified DNA polymerase and purified viral DNA as template, work for which he was awarded the Nobel prize. In the new work by Venter et al., they synthesized an active viral genome without using a prior existing template (but using a known DNA sequence). This is proof of concept for the synthesis of a completely artificial living organism.
 
J. Craig Venter! The same one whole sequenced the human genome :)

*edit*: et. al. :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K