I spend too much time with you guys

  • Thread starter Thread starter Smurf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the intersection of linguistics and mathematics, particularly through the lens of set theory. Participants share their experiences and thoughts on how these fields relate, while also engaging in light-hearted banter about their evolving identities as "sciency" individuals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about becoming more "sciency" due to their interactions with the forum community.
  • Another participant humorously suggests that this transformation may lead to adopting stereotypical traits of scientists, such as wearing a pocket protector.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between linguistics and mathematics, with some participants noting that both fields rely on logic and reasoning.
  • One participant mentions using set theory to argue about the definition of 'red', indicating a blend of linguistic and mathematical reasoning.
  • Another participant points out that there are areas of linguistics that are math-intensive, such as mathematical linguistics.
  • The idea that logic is a fundamental aspect of both linguistics and mathematics is raised, suggesting a deeper connection between the two disciplines.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to share an interest in the connections between linguistics and mathematics, but there is no consensus on the implications of these connections or the nature of their discussions. The conversation remains light-hearted and exploratory without resolving any deeper questions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference personal experiences and anecdotes, which may not fully capture the complexities of the relationship between linguistics and mathematics. The discussion includes humor and informal exchanges that may limit the depth of technical exploration.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in the interplay between linguistics and mathematics, as well as those who enjoy discussions that blend humor with academic topics.

Smurf
Messages
497
Reaction score
3
Okay, this is what happened. I'm having an argument with my 2 friends Tyra and Matt. We always argue about all sorts of things, and it's fun. But today was weird. Today we were arguing about a certain aspect of linguistics (a common subject between me and matt) and I decide to prove matt wrong using Set Theory.

Now, remember people, I failed grade 11 math. Math may come naturally to you lot because your all sciency (and I was too when I joined - that's changed). But I'm not mathematically inclined, I don't usually argue using mathematics, I tend to use reasoning and rhetoric.

I'm spending far too much time with you lot. You're turning me into a sciency person. :mad:
 
Science news on Phys.org
Smurf said:
I'm spending far too much time with you lot. You're turning me into a sciency person. :mad:

You can expect to start growing a pocket protector any time now.
 
protector? Do you mean protractor or something?
 
Smurf said:
protector? Do you mean protractor or something?

Its a genetic trait that most scientists have. It spreads like a cancer after infecting your shirt.
 
You like linguistics?! :cool: What were you talking about?
 
apparently linguistics is a lot like math... at least according to the kids in math club with me. when i got there this week they were having some discussion about it. so...
 
The connection is logic. Math is based on logical functions. Linguistics is based on logic and reasoning as well.
 
honestrosewater said:
You like linguistics?! :cool: What were you talking about?
Yeah. Linguistics is the best. :cool:
We were discussing a rather trivial matter actually. The part I used set theory for was to prove the definition of 'red' was singular (not even kidding).
 
Yeah, there are areas of linguistics that are quite math-intensive (mathematical linguistics, for one :rolleyes:). The tie to logic is even more basic - logic is itself a language. :smile:
Smurf said:
Yeah. Linguistics is the best. :cool:
We were discussing a rather trivial matter actually. The part I used set theory for was to prove the definition of 'red' was singular (not even kidding).
Well, next time you want to talk about linguistics, just pop in Social Sciences. :biggrin:
 
  • #10
Smurf said:
protector? Do you mean protractor or something?

There was no such thing as a nerd back in 1947, when Erich Klein opened a small factory on Chicago's North Side and became one of the first manufacturers to make plastic pocket protectors.

...But this simple polyvinyl chloride product evolved into something far more culturally symbolic: it became the ultimate emblem of nerdiness.[continued]
http://www.ieee.org/organizations/history_center/pocketprotector.html

Your new identity:
...The nerd is a small humanoid creature looking comically angry, like a thin, cross Chester A. Arthur. [continued]
http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery;jsessionid=1miihb9f9bt1u?method=4&dsid=2222&dekey=Nerd&gwp=8&curtab=2222_1&sbid=lc03b&linktext=nerd
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
98
Views
5K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 142 ·
5
Replies
142
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K