Inertia force of a reciprocating masses

  • Thread starter Thread starter hanson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Inertia
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation and understanding of the formula for the inertia force of reciprocating masses, particularly in the context of internal combustion engines. Participants explore the components of the formula, the assumptions made during its derivation, and the implications of these assumptions on the accuracy of the formula.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the formula for inertia force as F=mrω²{cosB+(cos2B)/n}, identifying the cosB term as the 1st harmonic and the cos2B term as the 2nd harmonic, while noting that the formula is an approximation under the assumption that n>>l.
  • The same participant expresses confusion about the higher order terms that may arise without this assumption and questions whether a Taylor series is involved in their derivation.
  • Another participant references "Internal Combustion Engines Applied Thermosciences," indicating that the equation includes a series expansion approximation to simplify piston displacement as a function of crank angle, providing an alternative expression for the force.
  • A question is raised about the potential mixing of rotating mass and reciprocating mass, suggesting that different formulas may be required to accurately measure true inertia for different components.
  • A later reply clarifies that the mass used in the inertia force equation should account for all reciprocating components and a portion of the connecting rod's mass, while noting that the inertia forces of the crankshaft should be evaluated separately due to their pure rotational nature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the formula to different components (rotating vs. reciprocating masses) and the assumptions underlying its derivation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of the higher order terms and the implications of the assumptions made.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made in the derivation of the inertia force formula, particularly the condition n>>l, and the dependence on the definitions of rotating and reciprocating masses. The discussion does not resolve these issues.

hanson
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
hi all!
I am learning the derivation of the formula of the inertia force of reciprocating masses, which is a typical formula that I am sure all of you must know.
F=mrw^2{cosB+(cos2B)/n}
I know that the cosB term is called the 1st harmonic, and the cos2B term is the 2nd harmonic.
Also, I know that this is not an exact formula, since a approximation was made in the derivation. That, n>>l, right?
But I cannot see if without the assumption, what will be the relation?
I am told that there should be some higher order terms after mw^2{cosB+(cos2B)/n}. But I don't see what they are and how they are produced. Is that something like Taylor series is used in order to produce the higher order terms??
I am confused.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
hanson said:
hi all!
I am learning the derivation of the formula of the inertia force of reciprocating masses, which is a typical formula that I am sure all of you must know.
F=mrw^2{cosB+(cos2B)/n}
I know that the cosB term is called the 1st harmonic, and the cos2B term is the 2nd harmonic.
Also, I know that this is not an exact formula, since a approximation was made in the derivation. That, n>>l, right?
But I cannot see if without the assumption, what will be the relation?
I am told that there should be some higher order terms after mw^2{cosB+(cos2B)/n}. But I don't see what they are and how they are produced. Is that something like Taylor series is used in order to produce the higher order terms??
I am confused.

According to "Internal Combustion Engines Applied Thermosciences" the equation you reference includes a series expansion approxmation [(1 - E) ^(1/2) is approxmately (1 - E/e)] to simplify the estimation of piston displacement as a function of crank angle.

The equation I have for force is:

F=maω^2 (cos⁡(β) + a/l cos(2β))

Where:
F is the instantaneous inertia force
m is the effecting rotating mass of the piston and connecting rod
a is the radius of the crankshaft
ω is the rotational velocity of the crankshaft in radians per unit time
β is the instantaneous crank angle
l is the length of the connecting rod
 
question- are you mixing rotating mass and reciprocating mass?
example only big end pf con rod is rotation
the piston end is reciprocating
will these not require different formulas to measure true inertia ?
 
There is a mix of the mass. The mass used in the equation should include the mass of all reciprocating components (piston, rings, and if employed, piston rod and cross-head) and a portion (estimated at 2/3) of the mass of the connecting rod. The inertia forces of the crankshaft should be evaluated separately as it is pure rotational and the inertia forces are dependent on the geometry of any counter weights. The most common use of the equation above is for calculating bearing loads and rod load reversal angles to ensure proper lubrication.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
11K