F=mv^2/r and Geosynchronouse orbits

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Elder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the mechanics of geosynchronous orbits, specifically why geostationary satellites remain in a fixed position relative to the Earth. Participants explore the relationship between gravitational force and centripetal force using relevant formulas.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about why geostationary satellites do not change orbits or fall, questioning the accuracy of their understanding and calculations.
  • Another participant suggests that unit conversion to meters, kilograms, and seconds is necessary for accurate calculations, providing a specific force value of 0.223 Newtons for the satellite.
  • A third participant elaborates on the relationship between gravitational force and centripetal force, deriving formulas and showing how they equate for circular orbits.
  • There is an acknowledgment of the mathematical derivation of the orbital period based on the balance of forces, leading to a formula involving the semi-major axis and gravitational parameter.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial confusion regarding the calculations, but there is agreement on the need for proper unit conversion and the relationship between gravitational and centripetal forces.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the initial misunderstanding of force calculations and potential inaccuracies in the assumptions made about the forces acting on the satellite.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in orbital mechanics, satellite dynamics, and the mathematical relationships governing motion in gravitational fields.

Elder
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
F=mv^2/r and Geosynchronouse orbits? Help Guys!

I’m having a mental block in understanding why geostationary satellites stay in the same place and don’t change orbits or simply fall out of the sky.

I may be using inaccurate information so please vet any and all suppositions I make here.

Using the formulas I found at this web site

http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/academy/rocket_sci/orbmech/formulas.html

I begin with determining the radius for a circular geosynchronous orbit the semi-major axis is given and it turns out to be 42168 Kilometers.

Now, I am assuming that if I calculate the Centrifugal Force on an object in geosynchronous orbit at this distance from the Center of the Earth it should equate to the Gravitational force the Earth exerts on it.

The formula I remember for Centrifugal force is F=mv^2/r

F= force
m= Mass
v=velocity
r=Radius

so an arbitrary 1 kilogram mass orbiting at r=42168 kilometer distance from the center of the Earth traveling at 2(PI)r/24= 11039.56 kilometers /hour around the Earth should have a gravitational force equal to the centrifugal force imposed on it by its orbit. Using the above formula F=mv^2/r, is equal to 2890.15 kilograms!

Does the Earth impose a gravitational force of over 2890 kilograms on a 1 kilogram object at 42168 kilometers away? I must be doing something or many things wrong! Maybe the formulas or even the premise of the question is wrong.

Please guys help me out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I think the biggest problem you are having is with units. First convert everything to meters, kilograms and seconds, and then do the math. You will find that you get an answer of .223 Newtons for the force on the satellite.

Do the same with the formula [itex]F_g = \frac{G \mu m}{r^2}[/itex], and you will get the same answer (within rounding error).
 
Last edited:
You can also get the formula given in the website by assuming that the gravitational force and centripetal force needed to hold the satellite in orbit are equal thusly.

For circular orbit centripetal force is:
[tex]F_c = \frac{mv^2}{r}[/tex]

The force due to gravity is:
[tex]F_g = \frac{GMm}{r^2}[/tex]

Now, [itex]GM = \mu[/itex] where M is the mass of the Earth, so:

[tex]F_g = \frac{\mu m}{r^2}[/tex]

We are assuming that Fg=Fc, so

[tex]\frac{\mu m}{r^2} = \frac{mv^2}{r}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\mu }{r} = v^2[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{\frac{\mu }{r}} =v[/tex]

The period is therefore:

[tex]T=\frac{2 \pi r}{\sqrt{\frac{\mu }{r}}}[/tex]

[tex]T=\frac{2 \pi r \sqrt{r}}{\sqrt{\mu }}[/tex]

[tex]T=\frac{2 \pi \sqrt{r^3}}{\sqrt{\mu }}[/tex]

[tex]T=2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{r^3}{\mu }}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Thanks!

Thanks Janus

Very much!


As to your closing signature quote from Bertrand Russell, I thought Hum, interesting but something has been nawing at me since I read it.
Actually the problem is too many of us are arrogant enough to think we know the difference between fool, fanatic, and the wise. :smile:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K