Electronic device read their thoughts

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential applications of brain-computer interface devices, particularly those designed for individuals with severe physical disabilities, and whether they could be adapted for use by others to enhance interpersonal relationships or address psychological issues. The scope includes theoretical implications, technological capabilities, and ethical considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether existing brain-computer interface devices could be used by others to improve relationships, suggesting a potential broader application beyond their current use for quadriplegics.
  • Another participant argues that these devices are limited in function and do not translate thoughts, emphasizing that improving relationships relies more on communication and understanding rather than technology.
  • A later reply speculates about the hypothetical future capabilities of these devices, suggesting that they might evolve to create more complex connections over time.
  • Concerns are raised about the applicability of these devices to coma patients, with a participant noting that the effectiveness depends on the type of coma and brain activity.
  • One participant provides information about the BrainGate Neural Interface System, clarifying that it is currently in clinical trials and primarily for physically disabled individuals, with no current eligibility for non-impaired individuals.
  • There is a discussion about the risks associated with surgery for implanting such devices, suggesting that the benefits may not outweigh the risks for non-impaired individuals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the potential for brain-computer interfaces to be used by non-impaired individuals, with some asserting that current technology is insufficient for such applications, while others speculate about future advancements. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of these devices for enhancing relationships or addressing psychological issues.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the current technological capabilities of brain-computer interfaces, the ethical considerations of their use in non-impaired individuals, and the varying definitions of coma and consciousness that affect the applicability of these devices.

NeedBioInfo
Messages
177
Reaction score
0
Could those chips which they can put in the brains of quadripletics (sorry, spelling mistake probably) which allow them to move objects by having an electronic device read their thoughts be used in other people (At a cost) for example those who wish to improve their relationships with others or something?

Thanks sorry have to go
 
Biology news on Phys.org
be used in other people (At a cost) for example those who wish to improve their relationships with others or something?

Simply no. the devices used are very very simple connection that allows few orders. It acts as an interface but does not really translate thoughts. It helps quadriplegic people to have a little independence with environment.

Improving a relationship is more based on dialogue, knowledge, synthesis... Not on such tiny chips.
 
But *could* these devices currently create a more complex connection and thus "translate thoughts"? I mean hypothetically, currently

thanks

(The question was asked more because the concept could hypothetically help to get rid of paranoia etc in relationships and thus perhaps introvertdness)
 
Hi,

But *could* these devicescurrently create a more complex connection

The problem is the currently word. Actually, no. In decades? In a century, perhaps...
 
And they wouldn't work in coma patients or anything like that right...

Because coma patients probably never think or anything?
 
Because coma patients probably never think or anything?
It depends of the kind of coma. If EEG is null thus no chip and nothing will work. In all other cases, coma is like deep sleep.
 
I think you are referring to an integrated circuit (IC) such as the BrainGate made by cyberkinetics

excerpt:
"The BrainGate™ Neural Interface System is an investigational medical device that is being developed to improve the quality of life for physically disabled people by allowing them to quickly and reliably control a wide range of devices including computers, environmental controls, robotics, telephone, television and medical devices."

Right now it is only being done as a pilot clinical trial. Besides quadriplegics, those with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (form of motor neuron disease) may be candidates for this implant. For a more technological discussion of this device, you can find more at this http://www.elecdesign.com/Articles/ArticleID/8210/8210.html

In answer to your question, people who are not physically impaired are not eligible for the study. If these devices are approved, then sometime in the future it may be possible to have one of these chips implanted into a non-impaired person. The initial risks of surgery will probably outweigh any benefit of this chip. Regarding "improving their relationships with others or something", that is not how this chip works. It is a brain-computer interface. So potentially, anything that can be controlled by a computer, could be controlled by the person's mind.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
893
Replies
2
Views
2K