View Poll Results: How would you rate PF?
Great 57 73.08%
Good 19 24.36%
Average 2 2.56%
Poor 0 0%
Very Poor 0 0%
Voters: 78. You may not vote on this poll

PF Review


by Greg Bernhardt
Tags: review
Greg Bernhardt
Greg Bernhardt is offline
#1
Oct3-05, 03:18 PM
Admin
Greg Bernhardt's Avatar
P: 8,542
It's been a long time since I asked for a collective opinion, but since we are preparing to upgrade this would be a good time. The PF staff and I work extremely hard to make PF a special place, day in and day out. We try to create a balance of quality and productive discussion, but within a light-hearted and positive atmosphere. For the few members that do let us know of suggestions and opinions you have about PF we appreciate it. The rest of you I hope will participate in this thread because every voice is important. I think we can all agree PF has come along way, but on the other hand I feel PF is just scratching the surface and we want to know how you think we can move forward. So some topics of discussion could be the features of PF, how we handle speculative posts, overall enviroment, quality of posts, staff responsiveness, balance of forum topics, new features you want, PF guidelines, ads, and in general what can we improve on.

This is also a good time to remind members to tell everyone you know about PF. Word of mouth is very important. If you're back in school tell your teachers and professors. If you're a teacher or professor tell your students. In fact if anyone gets their professor or teacher to sign up I'll give you premium membership
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
SensaBubble: It's a bubble, but not as we know it (w/ video)
The hemihelix: Scientists discover a new shape using rubber bands (w/ video)
Microbes provide insights into evolution of human language
mattmns
mattmns is offline
#2
Oct3-05, 03:44 PM
mattmns's Avatar
P: 1,119
I think you all do a great job here. I have told a few friends, and others who seemed like they would be interested, about pf, not sure if any have actually checked pf out though.
Moonbear
Moonbear is offline
#3
Oct3-05, 03:47 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Moonbear's Avatar
P: 12,257
I think it's great here! I can't think of anything off-hand other than the few new smilies we've requested. Otherwise, it seems we just need to see how some of the new forums and policies settle out as they get used more and adjust as we go. For example, it'll probably still be a bit of time before we shake all the bugs out of dealing with the new IR forum guidelines, but despite a slow start, we have at least gotten a good start now that sweetser has set the bar for the quality of posts we expect there.

The important thing is continuing to grow and adjust with the needs of the membership. The new history forum is a great example. I think there were requests for something like that in the past, but at the time, there was limited interest (or at least nobody really spoke up to support the suggestion when it was posted), so the time wasn't right, but as new members have come along and interest has gathered, and suggestions came in for ways to make a forum that combines multiple topics of interest to members, voila! A new forum is born!

robphy
robphy is offline
#4
Oct3-05, 04:08 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
robphy's Avatar
P: 4,108

PF Review


First, i want to say that I have a good time on these forums... maybe spending too much time. I enjoy thinking about problems that students are stuck on and try to address misconceptions. It's great when my attempts and those of others help the student see it for him/herself. (I'll make a mental note of it and keep it in my bag-o-tricks.) It's also nice to see someone contribute a clever solution. A great learning experience all around.

I personally would have liked LaTeX support in the journals. In that way, one can keep notes for one's own use... or as a reference for others. It might also be a private place to store (i.e., "postpone for continued editing later") a post that is being written [as is available in the blog].

Another improvement may be away to characterize threads for easy searching later. Maybe some relevant keywords could be given by a mentor, advisor, or HW-helper. Such keywords may carry more weight in a search query. Maybe thread-titles can be modified by them to avoid vague titles like "Please help me answer this question".

Personally, I think "Special & General Relativity" is a Physics topic, not an Astronomy and Cosmology topic.

(I was actually planning to tell my students about PF... but stuff happened. Maybe next semester.)
El Hombre Invisible
El Hombre Invisible is offline
#5
Oct3-05, 04:48 PM
P: 1,017
Loving it! I've told my tutor and she signed up. Unfortunately she won't tell me her user name... and... and... some of this post may deviate from the truth slightly. That aside, can I get free premium membership?

Seriously love the site, but don't exploit the features enough to give much of a critique. The people are sound on the whole, and the forums are exhaustive and intuitive. Gold star... premium membership... top notch... prem-
Moonbear
Moonbear is offline
#6
Oct3-05, 07:07 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Moonbear's Avatar
P: 12,257
Quote Quote by robphy
Another improvement may be away to characterize threads for easy searching later. Maybe some relevant keywords could be given by a mentor, advisor, or HW-helper. Such keywords may carry more weight in a search query. Maybe thread-titles can be modified by them to avoid vague titles like "Please help me answer this question".
Adding keywords sounds like a good idea; whether it's possible to implement is a whole different issue of course. I'm not so sure about modifying the title...a student may have trouble finding their own thread if that was done. It would be nice if anyone replying could add keywords so the mentors wouldn't have to do that for every post if the person posting it didn't add it (just do this in Homework Help...in the other forums, there is usually enough information in the post for a search to pull it up). Even if it was something simple like "kinematics" or "inclined plane" to categorize questions as they answer them. If that was done, then we could encourage students to search by keywords for similar problems they could use for further study/practice if they need it.

OT: Have you found a new place to call home and continue your studies for the time being?
robphy
robphy is offline
#7
Oct3-05, 07:25 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
robphy's Avatar
P: 4,108
Quote Quote by Moonbear
Adding keywords sounds like a good idea; whether it's possible to implement is a whole different issue of course. I'm not so sure about modifying the title...a student may have trouble finding their own thread if that was done.
I was think of something like this:
OLD TITLE: "Please help me answer this question"
NEW TITLE: "Please help me answer this question [atwood machine]"

Quote Quote by Moonbear
OT: Have you found a new place to call home and continue your studies for the time being?
Yes. I've returned to Syracuse. Thanks for asking.
JamesU
JamesU is offline
#8
Oct3-05, 08:12 PM
PF Gold
JamesU's Avatar
P: 745
I wonder who rated this forums as 'average'
Greg Bernhardt
Greg Bernhardt is offline
#9
Oct3-05, 08:34 PM
Admin
Greg Bernhardt's Avatar
P: 8,542
Quote Quote by Moonbear
I think it's great here! I can't think of anything off-hand other than the few new smilies we've requested!
I'm sure that request can be taken care of

I personally would have liked LaTeX support in the journals
I'll talk to warren to see if this can be accomplished elegantly.

Another improvement may be away to characterize threads for easy searching later.
I agree, but this is really dependant of the members and unfortunately I feel most really don't care enough to take the time to think of a solid title.

I wonder who rated this forums as 'average'
I hope this person voices their opinion since they obviously think we can improve and must have some ideas.
z-component
z-component is offline
#10
Oct3-05, 08:50 PM
z-component's Avatar
P: 483
I voted "great" because the quality of PF has shown to be "great" overall. That so many scholars and highly-esteemed people all gather here is something that a lot of communities lack, and is PF's signature feature. I believe the quality is high also because of the comfort and familiarity of our members. The daily operations of PF will always include homework assistance, but as an aside, we managed to create a very warm and friendly environment with each other. The emotional attachment aspect is something to be very proud of as I'm sure others feel the exact same way.

Keep it up. :)
hypatia
hypatia is offline
#11
Oct4-05, 07:37 AM
hypatia's Avatar
P: 1,296
Its still the best science/physics forum on the web! Everyone does a outstanding job.
ZapperZ
ZapperZ is offline
#12
Oct4-05, 07:39 AM
Mentor
ZapperZ's Avatar
P: 28,838
Quote Quote by Greg Bernhardt
I hope this person voices their opinion since they obviously think we can improve and must have some ideas.
It's just "average" as a philosophy forum, Greg. So don't sweat it!

<ZapperZ runs and hides>

:)

Zz.
honestrosewater
honestrosewater is offline
#13
Oct4-05, 07:53 AM
PF Gold
honestrosewater's Avatar
P: 2,330
I think PF is great. I don't have any suggestions for the people or policies, but I can think of some features...
It would be nice to be able to select which forums are included in the New Posts search. Maybe it could be added to the options to exclude News Reporter and Usenet posts?

How about a 'best of PF / hall of fame / FAQ-in-progress' section where we can collect those threads containing especially good explanations, discussions, answers to FAQs, etc. that are currently getting buried? Something like the Links section and GD's Classics thread. I imagine the benefits are pretty obvious. For quality control, perhaps members could nominate threads to be included in the section, but a staff member would have to approve them before being added. It could be a list of linked (possibly amended) thread titles organized just like the forums. ??
Greg Bernhardt
Greg Bernhardt is offline
#14
Oct4-05, 11:31 AM
Admin
Greg Bernhardt's Avatar
P: 8,542
Quote Quote by honestrosewater
How about a 'best of PF / hall of fame / FAQ-in-progress' section where we can collect those threads containing especially good explanations, discussions, answers to FAQs, etc. that are currently getting buried? Something like the Links section and GD's Classics thread. I imagine the benefits are pretty obvious. For quality control, perhaps members could nominate threads to be included in the section, but a staff member would have to approve them before being added. It could be a list of linked (possibly amended) thread titles organized just like the forums. ??
I like this idea
Lisa!
Lisa! is offline
#15
Oct4-05, 12:26 PM
PF Gold
Lisa!'s Avatar
P: 971
I think this forum is great, I visited some other science forums and didn't like them alot. But you know since it's a very busy forum, I have some problem to check all the threads and find my favorites. And I have to admit that I dislike the HW part, although it's very useful. Anyway I think homework helpers and the mentor of that part are doing a great job and are really patient.
And I think social sciences forum is too quiet, but it's not starnge since here is a physics forum.
DaveC426913
DaveC426913 is offline
#16
Oct4-05, 12:51 PM
DaveC426913's Avatar
P: 15,325
For starters, it's a great board - even if you don't change a thing!


Some nice-to-haves:

unsub from whole fora. Would make browsing New Posts easier, if I didn't have to wade through the politics and world affairs or whatever threads.

ability to view threads I've been participating in. Currently, I've got to use search to look for all posts with me as a participant. And/or it'd be nice to have an address-line URL for this, since I do that a lot.

a more intuitive place for latex summary. I use it a lot, but really, just the basics is fine for me, not the whole PDF. Currently, I have to search the FAQ, which spits out a URL - not even a live link, just dead text, which I must then copy and paste into the address field.

Some slightly easier quizzes maybe? They are all way over my head.
Tom Mattson
Tom Mattson is offline
#17
Oct4-05, 01:06 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Tom Mattson's Avatar
P: 5,540
Quote Quote by DaveC426913
ability to view threads I've been participating in. Currently, I've got to use search to look for all posts with me as a participant. And/or it'd be nice to have an address-line URL for this, since I do that a lot.
We've got that, and in fact you can easily find posts made by anyone. Click on any username you are interested in (on any of that user's posts, or in the "Currently Active User's" list). You'll be directed to that user's Public Profile page, and on the left you'll see "Find all posts by (username)" and "Find all threads by (username)". You'll get the most recent 500 of each.
honestrosewater
honestrosewater is offline
#18
Oct4-05, 01:17 PM
PF Gold
honestrosewater's Avatar
P: 2,330
Dave,
You can also use the Subscribed Threads link in the Quick Links menu at the top of each page. You can bookmark the page too - I do. You can manage your thread subscriptions in the User Control Panel (I think by default you are automatically subscribed to a thread in which you post, but you can change this in Edit Options); And if you're reading a thread that you want to subscribe to, just pull down the Thread Tools menu at the top of the thread and click Subscribe to this thread.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
limits review Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Help w/ review of lab conclusion Introductory Physics Homework 1
AP Review Help Introductory Physics Homework 3
REU review! Academic Guidance 12
Review Introductory Physics Homework 1