Finite dimensional real vector space

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of the orthogonal complement of a subspace W in a finite dimensional real vector space V, defined by the inner product < , >. Key conclusions include that W^o is a subspace of V, the intersection of W and W^o is solely the zero vector, and the relationship between their dimensions is given by the equation dim W + dim W^o = dim V. The user successfully proved the first two parts and sought assistance for the dimension proof, which was addressed by suggesting the use of bases for W and W^o.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite dimensional real vector spaces
  • Knowledge of inner product spaces
  • Familiarity with subspaces and their properties
  • Concept of basis and dimension in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of orthogonal complements in inner product spaces
  • Learn about the Gram-Schmidt process for orthonormal bases
  • Explore the Rank-Nullity Theorem in linear algebra
  • Investigate the relationship between linear independence and dimension
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, vector spaces, and inner product theory, will benefit from this discussion.

Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hi can someone assist me with the following question?

Q. Let V be a finite dimensional real vector space with inner product < , > and let W be a subspace of V. Then the orthogonal complement of W is defined as follows.

[tex] W^o = \{ v \in V: < v,w > = 0,w \in W\} [/tex]

Prove the following:

a) [tex]W^o[/tex] is a subspace of V.
b) [tex]W \cap W^o = \left\{ {\mathop 0\limits^ \to } \right\}[/tex]
c) [tex]\dim W + \dim W^o = \dim V[/tex]

My working:

I can do the first part but the others are a problem for me.

b) W and W^o are both subspaces of V and so they both contain the zero vector. Then their intersection also contains the zero vector. Suppose the intersection contains some non-zero vector say f. Then we must have <f,f> = 0 for some non-zero vector f. But this contradicts some inner product property which says <f,f> = 0 iff f = zero vector. So from that I conclude that [tex]W \cap W^o = \left\{ {\mathop 0\limits^ \to } \right\}[/tex].

c) I can't think of a way to do this one. I know that dim(V) >= dim(W), dim(W_0) because any linearly independent set in V has most k elements where k is the number of vectors in a basis for V.

Can someone help me with part c or check my answer for part b? Any help appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer to (b) is completely correct.

To do (c), choose a basis for [tex]W[/tex] and a basis for [tex]W^0[/tex].
Show that their union is a basis for [tex]V[/tex].
 
Ok thanks for your help HallsofIvy, I'll give that a go.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K