What is the radius of the circle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GJBenn85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Radius
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the radius of a circle given an arc length and a central angle in radians. The specific problem involves an arc of 3 feet and a central angle of 1.8 radians, utilizing the formula s = rθ.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the formula s = rθ and question the interpretation of significant figures in their answers. Some express confusion about whether additional conversions are necessary for the angle.

Discussion Status

There is a mix of attempts to solve the problem and reflections on the significance of the figures in the answers provided. Some participants have expressed confidence in their calculations, while others have raised concerns about accuracy and significant figures without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of significant figures based on the given data, with some suggesting that the original poster's answer may not reflect the appropriate level of precision. There is also mention of varying expectations regarding significant figures in different educational contexts.

GJBenn85
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
"Use the formula s = rθ ( "θ" is NOT an 8) to solve the following problem. An arc of 3 feet subtends a central angle of 1.8 radians. What is the radius of the circle?"

How do I do this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GJBenn85 said:
"Use the formula s = rθ ( "θ" is NOT an 8) to solve the following problem. An arc of 3 feet subtends a central angle of 1.8 radians. What is the radius of the circle?"

How do I do this problem?

It might help to know what "the formula s = rθ" means.
(arc length)=(radius)(central angle subtended).

Could you do the problem if the angle is [tex]2\pi=2(3.1415...)[/tex] radians?
 
Nevermind...think I figured it out.

Radius of 1.666666667 feet, or 20 inches sound right?
 
GJBenn85 said:
Nevermind...think I figured it out.

Radius of 1.666666667 feet, or 20 inches sound right?
Yes it does.

Alex
 
GJBenn85 said:
Nevermind...think I figured it out.

Radius of 1.666666667 feet, or 20 inches sound right?
No it is not correct. Your given numbers have only 2 significant digits, how can you claim 10 digits? The correct answer should be 1.7 ft.

Copying all the digits which show up on your calculator is a very bad habit. Learn to give answers which reflect the significant digits of the problem.
 
Oh yeah, sorry I was talking about inches.
 
Integral said:
No it is not correct. Your given numbers have only 2 significant digits, how can you claim 10 digits? The correct answer should be 1.7 ft.

Copying all the digits which show up on your calculator is a very bad habit. Learn to give answers which reflect the significant digits of the problem.

He said "20 inches" which is to two significant figures!

GJBenn85: If you are taking calculus, you certainly should be able to solve and equation like s= rθ for r! I'm glad you wer able to figure it out.
 
HallsofIvy said:
GJBenn85: If you are taking calculus, you certainly should be able to solve and equation like s= rθ for r! .

I know. It was a case of me trying to turn a simple problem into a more complex one. For some reason, I was thinking i had to convert the 1.8 radians into something else. Simple things smack me in the face. :)
 
HallsofIvy said:
He said "20 inches" which is to two significant figures!
GJBenn85: If you are taking calculus, you certainly should be able to solve and equation like s= rθ for r! I'm glad you wer able to figure it out.


... not to split hairs .. but ...
20 inches has 1 significant figure
20. inches has 2 significant figures

PLUS .. many math classes don't require significant figures.. and if they do then the person has it so hammered into their head that they'd shudder at thinking about it .. AND .. writing all the digits from a calculator is a GOOD thing unless you're at a FINAL answer, and since there are most definitely 12 in / 1 ft, (a definition) ... then had the person done 1.7 ft it would be off and what if the measurements were given as exact values? ... values found in a theoretical sense of perfect measurements
 
  • #10
stmoe said:
... not to split hairs .. but ...
20 inches has 1 significant figure
20. inches has 2 significant figures
PLUS .. many math classes don't require significant figures.. and if they do then the person has it so hammered into their head that they'd shudder at thinking about it .. AND .. writing all the digits from a calculator is a GOOD thing unless you're at a FINAL answer, and since there are most definitely 12 in / 1 ft, (a definition) ... then had the person done 1.7 ft it would be off and what if the measurements were given as exact values? ... values found in a theoretical sense of perfect measurements

Sometimes it is according to the teachers. Mine say three sigfigs, unless it specifically says different.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K