Modulo, congruences and primes - the love story

  • Thread starter Thread starter Virtate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Love Primes
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a proof involving modular arithmetic, specifically concerning a prime number \( p \) and an integer \( a \) that is not divisible by \( p \). The goal is to demonstrate the existence of an integer \( b \) such that \( ba \equiv 1 \mod p^2 \).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss starting with a simpler case of modulo \( p \) before extending to modulo \( p^2 \). There are inquiries about the workings of the proof for modulo \( p \) and suggestions to explore properties of sets formed by multiplying elements in modular arithmetic.

Discussion Status

Some participants have begun to outline approaches, such as using the properties of sets in modular arithmetic and the concept of the greatest common divisor. There is an ongoing exploration of foundational results necessary for the proof, but no consensus has been reached on a complete method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the proof for modulo \( p \) as a stepping stone to tackling the more complex case of modulo \( p^2 \). There is mention of using proof by contradiction and the fundamental theorem of arithmetic in the discussion.

Virtate
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Can somebody please give me a hint as to how to do the following proof please? I have no idea what to use or where to start :(

Suppose that p is a prime and a is an integer which is not divisible by p. Prove that there exists an integer b such that ba is congruent to 1 mod p^2.

Thank you.

T
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you done the proof for modulo p (instead of modulo p^2) yet? If not then it's probably best to start there and once you understand that one it's pretty easy to exdend that same concepts to the "modulo p^2" case
 
No, I haven't... How does that one work?
 
[tex]\gcd(a,p)=1\Rightarrow \exists u,v\in \mathbb{Z}:au+pv=1 \Rightarrow p|1-au[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow au\equiv 1 (\bmod p)\Rightarrow [a]_p<u>_p=[1]_p</u>[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Virtate said:
No, I haven't... How does that one work?

Start with the set of all integers that are non-zero module p. That is S_1 = {1,2,3,...,p-1}.

Now consider the new set (call it say S_a) that results from multiplying each element in S_1 by a, where a is not a multiple of p (which is the same thing as saying that "a" is an element of S_1, since we're doing everything in module-p).
That is S_a = {a, 2a, 3a,...,(p-1)a}

You need to prove that the set S_a is actually the very same set as S_1.That is, S_a has all the same elements (no repeats and none missing) as S_1. This is a really fundamental result, you need to understand this proof. Attack it in two steps. First prove that there are no zero elements in S_a and then prove that there are no repeats.

Proof by condradiction is very useful here. Also use the fundamental theorum of arithmetic (uniqueness of prime factorization) to prove those above two properties of S_a.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K