Reparamterizing, I think i got the answer but whats up with the t = 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr_coffee
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the reparameterization of a curve represented by the function r(t), specifically with respect to arc length measured from the point (1,0,1) as t increases. Participants express confusion regarding the significance of the point when t = 0 and how it relates to the overall problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of reparameterization and the implications of evaluating the curve at t = 0. There are questions about the correctness of the integral setup and the interpretation of constants during integration.

Discussion Status

Some participants are seeking clarification on the integration process and the role of the initial condition t = 0. There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical reasoning behind the steps taken, with no clear consensus yet on the interpretation of the results.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the extent of assistance they can provide to one another. The original poster is preparing for an exam and is focused on understanding the problem rather than seeking direct answers.

mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone, Did i do this all right? I don't get what the point of this part is...
THe directions say, Reparameterize the curve r(t) which is listed on my image. With respect to arc elnth measured from the point (1,0,1) in the direction of incresing t. Well if u plug in t = 0, u will get the point (1,0,1), so what>? to make the problem correct, do i just have to note that somewhere? Here is my work and the final answer, is that acceptable? i can't see if I'm right or not and its just for studying for an exam. Thanks.
http://show.imagehosting.us/show/775217/0/nouser_775/T0_-1_775217.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
mr_coffee said:
Hello everyone, Did i do this all right? I don't get what the point of this part is...
THe directions say, Reparameterize the curve r(t) which is listed on my image. With respect to arc elnth measured from the point (1,0,1) in the direction of incresing t. Well if u plug in t = 0, u will get the point (1,0,1), so what>? to make the problem correct, do i just have to note that somewhere? Here is my work and the final answer, is that acceptable? i can't see if I'm right or not and its just for studying for an exam. Thanks.
http://show.imagehosting.us/show/775217/0/nouser_775/T0_-1_775217.jpg
I'm curious why you wrote:

[tex]s(t)=\int_0^t\sqrt{2}e^{t}\,du[/tex]

Did you mean dt? If so, then it should equal [itex]\sqrt{2}\left(e^t-1\right)[/itex].

Alex
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh yeah my bad, sorry! hm..how did u get e^t-1? if [tex]sqrt{2}[/tex] is a constant, can't u just bring it out? and get... sqrt(2)[tex]\int[/tex]e^t? and isn't the integral of e^t just e^t?
 
mr_coffee said:
Oh yeah my bad, sorry! hm..how did u get e^t-1? if [tex]sqrt{2}[/tex] is a constant, can't u just bring it out? and get... sqrt(2)[tex]\int[/tex]e^t? and isn't the integral of e^t just e^t?
Yes, but remember that you are integrating from u=0 to u=t. What is the value of e0? It isn't 0 like you assumed in your work :smile:

Alex
 
ohh, t hanks again alex for the help...
so i'd get t = ln|s/sqrt(2) + 1|; do u know where the t = 0 comes in? or do i just state, t = 0?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
30K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K