Help with impedance matching problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving an impedance matching problem involving light transitioning from air to a glass lens with a refractive index of 1.5. The key equations used include Z=1/n for impedance and Z2=sqrt(Z1*Z3) for calculating the impedance of the coating with a refractive index of 1.22 and thickness of 1.12E-7 m. The participants clarify that the theoretical condition for no reflection requires the input impedance of the coating to match the intrinsic impedance of EM waves in air, leading to the conclusion that the thickness of the coating should be λ/4, where λ is the wavelength in the coating medium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of impedance in optics
  • Familiarity with refractive indices and their calculations
  • Knowledge of wave propagation and boundary conditions
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between impedance and refractive index in dielectric materials
  • Learn about the derivation and application of the Fresnel equations for reflection and transmission
  • Investigate the concept of quarter-wave coatings and their applications in optics
  • Explore the implications of lossless dielectrics in electromagnetic wave propagation
USEFUL FOR

Optical engineers, physicists, and students studying optics or electromagnetic theory who are looking to deepen their understanding of impedance matching and its practical applications in optical coatings.

ruku320
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Ok, need some help with the end part of this, here's the problem...

The relation between the impedance Z and the refractive index n of a dielectric is given by Z=1/n. Light traveling in free space enters a glass lens which has a refractive index of 1.5 for free space wavelength of 5.5E-7 m. Show that the reflections of this wavelength are avoided by a coating of refractive index 1.22 and thickness 1.12E-7 m.


Alright, since this is just a impedance mathching problem, you know that Z2=sqrt(Z1*Z3). In this case, Z1 is just 1 since its air and Z3=1/1.5. Solving for this you get Z2=1/1.22 where n=1.22.

The next part is where I have a problem. You know from the boundary conditions that Z1/Z2=(A2-B2)/(A1-B1) where A1 is the amplitude of the light in Z1, B1 is the amplitude of the reflected wave in Z1 and the same for A2 and B2. If you go back a few steps you also know that k1/k2=(A2-B2)/(A1-B1) where k1 and k2 are the wave number (2PI/wavelength). So, you should be able to set Z1/Z2=k1/k2 and then plug in what you know and solve for the wavelength of the wave when its in Z2. Once you get that you know that the thickness of the coating should be l=wavelenth/4 since this is a given in a impedance matching problem.

However, when i solve out everything, I don't get 1.12E-7. I find that I get 1.67E-7 instead and the only way to get 1.12E-7 is if Z1/Z2=k2/k1. I've checked my algebra many times I really don't see a problem in it. Anyone have any idea what I could be doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wow, you're doing quite a lot of things here, and I'm not sure how to follow. The theoretical condition for no reflection from an impedence point of view is for the input impedance into the coating to be equal to the intrinsic impedence of EM waves in air. The waves will thus "feel" like there has been no change in medium at all.

Let medium 1 be air with intrinsic impedence [tex]\sqrt{\frac{\mu_0}{\epsilon_0}}[/tex], medium 2 be the coating, 3 be the glass and propagation in the positive z direction. Assume lossless dielectrics. Now from the equation:

[tex]\eta_i_n = \eta_2\frac{\eta_3 + j\,\eta_2tan\beta z}{\eta_2 + j\,\eta_3tan\beta z}[/tex]

[tex] \eta_i_n = \eta_1<br /> <br /> \eta_1 = \eta_2\frac{\eta_3 + j\,\eta_2tan\beta z}{\eta_2 + j\,\eta_3tan\beta z}[/tex]

For them to be equal, we have two solutions, but we are more interested in the one where the imaginary side approaches infinity. Then

[tex]\eta_1 = \frac{\eta_2^2}{\eta_3}[/tex]

For the imaginary to approach infinity, we must have
[tex]\tan\beta z \rightarrow \infty[/tex] or [tex]\beta z = \pi/2, 3\pi/4,...[/tex]

Solving simply for z, or d, as the propagation constant beta is fixed for a specific wave length and medium (medium 2 - coating).

[tex]d = \frac{\lambda_2}{4}[/tex]

If you calculate the wavelength of 5.5E-7 m in the coating or 5.5E-7/1.22, and plug it into that equation, you get your answer.

For the goodness of GOD! Finally I've fixed the latex.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K