Can Quantum Computers Revolutionize Computing with 32 States per Electron?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of using 32 quantum states of an electron in quantum computing, inspired by Richard Feynman's ideas. Participants explore the feasibility of data storage and the construction of such a supercomputer, touching on the implications for speed compared to traditional binary systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how data could be stored using 32 quantum states and how such a computer could be built.
  • Another participant suggests that teaching about quantum computing is complex and recommends investigating existing resources for more specific questions.
  • A participant mentions that qubits may deteriorate, indicating a potential limitation in their use, though details are not provided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the feasibility of using 32 states per electron for quantum computing, and multiple viewpoints regarding the understanding and implications of quantum states are present.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of detailed explanations about the mechanisms of data storage in quantum states and the unresolved nature of qubit deterioration over time.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in quantum computing, particularly those exploring theoretical concepts and practical challenges in the field.

extreme_machinations
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
I Read About Richard Feynmann's Idea Of Using All The 32 Quantum States Of An Electron To Construct A Supercomputer Which Would Be Much Faster Than The Present Ones That Use Only The Two Binary States.i Do Not Understand How Data Could Be Stored This Way And How Such A Computer Could Be Built?
In Search Of Enlightenment !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do You Hold The Shift Key For The First Letter Of Every Word? Isn't That Really Slow?
 
No I Just Type In Uppercase And The Site Filters Do The Rest ,i Suppose.
 
I wouldn't want to say anything mean about people who type in all caps.

Uhgh. Sorry, but teaching someone about quantum computing takes too much time to explain! Maybe you should investigate a few links and come back with more specific questions? :smile:

Also try a search on physicsforums for "quantum computer." There have been some interesting topics I remember.
 
An item in this month's SciAm indicates that the qubits (sp?) deteriorate, although possibly after a long enough time to do their job. Can't remember the details right now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K