Quantum Tunneling Probability Calculation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the quantum tunneling probability for a particle encountering a potential barrier, specifically using the Schrödinger time-independent equation. Participants explore mathematical approaches and provide insights related to the setup of the problem, including boundary conditions and wave functions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, Nille, presents the Schrödinger equation and describes the wave functions before, inside, and after the barrier, expressing uncertainty about solving the resulting system of equations.
  • Another participant suggests including normalization in the wave function and proposes using matrices or a more tedious method to solve for the unknowns A, B, R, and T, indicating that the transmission probability can be expressed as P = |T|^2 / |I|^2.
  • A different participant questions the energy constants used by Nille, suggesting corrections for the case where 0 < E < V, and provides alternative expressions for k and κ.
  • A later reply encourages Nille to seek tips for solving the equation system, indicating that it may be challenging.
  • Another participant provides a different formulation of the Schrödinger equation and boundary conditions, suggesting that the equations at the boundaries differ from those presented by Nille and offers a method to solve for R and T.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the formulation of the problem and the constants involved, with no consensus reached on the best approach to solve the system of equations or the correct expressions for the energy constants.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of the constants and the specific conditions of the potential barrier, as well as the normalization of wave functions. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the boundary conditions and mathematical setup.

nille40
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone!
I'm having some problem calculating the probability for a particle to penetrate a barrier (potential well). This is a math assignment in school, and we haven't learned anything about this area, so I may be fumbling in the dark completely.

Anyway, we have the Schrödinger time-independent equation:

[tex]\frac{h^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\psi (x)+U(x)\psi (x) = E \psi (x)[/tex]

The equation before the barrier is [tex]\psi (x) = e^{ikx} + Re^{-ikx}[/tex] (incoming and reflected wave).
The equation in the barrier is [tex]\psi (x) = Ae^{imx} + Be^{-imx}[/tex]
The equation after the barrier is [tex]\psi (x) = Te^{ikx}[/tex]

If I've calculated right, the constants (k and m) should be:
[tex]k = +- i \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{h}, x < a or x > b[/tex]
[tex]m = +- i \frac{\sqrt{2m(E-U_0)}}{h}[/tex]

We know that [tex]U(x) = 0[/tex] when [tex]x < a[/tex] or [tex]x > b[/tex] (outside of the barrier) and [tex]U(x) = U_0, a < x < b[/tex] (inside the barrier).

We have for unknown variables - A,B,R and T. We are supposed to get the probability from [tex]|T|^2[/tex]. We was instructed to derive the functions so that we got 4 function, which should yield an equation system when we attach the functions to each other. So we set:

[tex]e^{ika} + Re^{-ika} = Ae^{ima} + Be^{-ima}[/tex]
[tex]Te^{ikb} = Ae^{imb} + Be^{-imb}[/tex]
[tex]ke^{ika} - Rkae^{-ika} = mAe^{ima} - mBe^{-ima}[/tex]
[tex]kTe^{ikb} = imAe^{imb} - mBe^{-imb}[/tex]

How can I solve this system? Of course, I do not expect you to do this for me, I was just hoping you could help me do it.

Oh, and english isn't my native language, so if the lingo is messed up sometimes - sorry. And I hope the tex stuff works...

Thanks in advance,
Nille
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Things are looking pretty good so far. For your function before the barrier, it is usual to include normalization on everything, including the first exponential term (unless you have been told specifically not to).
[tex]\psi=Ie^{ikx}+Re^{-ikx}[/tex]

Other than that, it is a matter of dregding through the equations. It is most likely duable using matrices, or the tedious way. In that case, you will want to solve for A and B in terms of T, then use those relations to solve for I in terms of T. Your transmission probability is then

[tex]P=\frac{|T|^2}{|I|^2}[/tex]

Also, I would choose a different letter for your energy constant inside the barrier, so you don't confuse it with the mass m.
 
Also, I am guessing you are considering the case where 0<E<V. In that case, you might want to check your energy constants. They should probably be

[tex] k=\frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar}[/tex]
[tex] \kappa=\frac{\sqrt{2m(U_0-E)}}{\hbar}[/tex]

Your solution inside the well would then be

[tex] \psi=Ae^{\kappa x}+Be^{-\kappa x}[/tex]
 
That was fast! Thanks!

Do you have any tips on how to solve the equation system? I tried today, and it seams it is hard to do it...

Thanks!
Nille
 
try to correct and solve this problem

the Schrödinger time-independent equation is written as:
[tex]-\frac{h^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\psi (x)+U(x)\psi (x) = E \psi (x)[/tex]
Here,I would like to demonstrate the case of 0<E<U.Consider a barrier with a potential of U and width of a.For simplifying,the barrier is from zero to a in x-axis.
The equations at the boundary of the barrier are some different from nille40's.
x=0,[tex]\psi (x) & \psi (x)^'[/tex] are continuous:
[tex]1+R=A+B[/tex]
[tex]\frac{ik}{m}(1-R)=A-B[/tex]
x=a
[tex]Ae^{mb}+Be^{-mb}=Te^{ikb}[/tex]
[tex]Ae^{mb}-Be^{-mb}=\frac{ik}{m}Te^{ikb}[/tex]
Usually,R and T are concerned.To Solve T and R is not so difficult in above equations.
May this can give you some idea.
good luck.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K