Linear algebra and matrix operations: correct me if im wrong

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of matrix operations in linear algebra, specifically addressing the validity of expressing matrix relationships in terms of division. Participants are exploring the implications of linear transformations and their standard matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the validity of expressing matrix relationships using division, while others suggest that division can be interpreted as multiplication by an inverse under certain conditions. There is also a discussion about the distinction between matrix and vector division.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing differing perspectives on the concept of matrix division and its implications. Some guidance has been offered regarding the conditions under which division can be considered valid, particularly in relation to the existence of inverses.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion is constrained by the definitions and assumptions commonly accepted in introductory linear algebra, particularly regarding the operations that can be performed on matrices and vectors.

tandoorichicken
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
as far as intro linear algebra is concerned, there's no such thing as matrix division and its not valid to say that for a linear transformation T(x) and its standard matrix A,

[tex]A = \frac{T(\vec{x})}{\vec{x}}[/tex]

just because [itex]T(\vec{x}) = A\vec{x}[/itex]


Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's been awhile since I've done linear algebra, but this seems like more of a semantic question than anything else. Division is simply multiplication by the inverse. (My LaTEX skills also stink, so I'll have to do this in words.) It may be more correct to say

A = T(x)*inv(x) than A = T(x)/x,

but I think you'd be in the right to say that's division. It assumes, of course, that the inverse of x exists - but if it doesn't, you couldn't divide by it anyway.

Your professor may have other opinions than mine - I'd suggest you ask her.
 
tandoorichicken said:
as far as intro linear algebra is concerned, there's no such thing as matrix division and its not valid to say that for a linear transformation T(x) and its standard matrix A,
[tex]A = \frac{T(\vec{x})}{\vec{x}}[/tex]
just because [itex]T(\vec{x}) = A\vec{x}[/itex]
Am I right?

Actually, there IS such a thing as "matrix division" if the matrix has an inverse- multiply by the inverse matrix.

There is, however, no such thing as "vector division" which is what your second question is about. It certainly would make no sense to write what you have above.
 
HallsofIvy said:
It certainly would make no sense to write what you have above.


Thanks. I didn't think so.
 
If Ax = T(x), and x has a right inverse y (a matrix such that xy is the identity matrix with the same number of rows as x), then:

Axy = T(x)y
A = T(x)y

If you want to denote right multiplication by the right inverse of x as division by x, you can do so, but this only makes sense when x has a right inverse, and when the number of columns of whatever you're dividing has the same number of rows as the right inverse of x. If x is a column vector, it won't have a right inverse unless it is a 1x1 non-zero matrix.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K