How do you get from calculus to stochastic calculus?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the educational pathway to understanding stochastic calculus, particularly for individuals with a background in basic calculus and statistics. Participants explore the prerequisites, including measure-theoretic probability, and express challenges in comprehending introductory materials from a specific textbook.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in understanding the introductory content of the book "Elementary Stochastic Calculus with Finance in View" and seeks guidance on the necessary mathematical background.
  • Another participant suggests that familiarity with measure-theoretic probability is essential for studying stochastic calculus.
  • A participant mentions they are currently reviewing basic calculus and statistics and requests recommendations for less rigorous books and courses to bridge the gap to measure-theoretic probability.
  • The initial participant describes the content of the book's first two pages, highlighting confusion regarding the concept of a σ-field and its relevance to probability.
  • One reply provides a link to lecture notes as a potential resource for understanding the subject matter better.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a solid foundation in measure-theoretic probability is important for understanding stochastic calculus. However, there is no consensus on the best resources or pathways to achieve this understanding, and the discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with the necessary mathematical concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the rigor required for their studies and the specific mathematical concepts involved, such as σ-fields, which may depend on individual learning preferences and backgrounds.

aliendoom
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
What is the path of study to understand stochastic calculus? I bought the book "Elementary Stochastic Calculus with Finance in View" (Mikosch) because it was touted as a non rigorous introduction to stochastic calculus, and I spent three days trying to decipher the first two pages. :(
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What level of mathematics education have you reached? You probably ought to have at least some level of familiarity with measure-theoretic probabality theory. What was the content of the first two pages?
 
What level of mathematics education have you reached?
I'm currently brushing up on forgotten calculus and statistics, so I'm afraid I haven't retained very much of my math education.
You probably ought to have at least some level of familiarity with measure-theoretic probabality theory.
How do I get from basic calculus and statistics to measure-theoretic probability? Do you have any book recommendations. I guess I would be looking for the least rigorous books available. A list of courses might be helpful as well, so I could see the progression and how far away I am.
What was the content of the first two pages?
The book starts out its description in the setting of a coin flip experiment. It says, if we let "heads" equal 1 and "tails" equal 0, then we get a random variable:

[itex]X=X(\omega)\epsilon\{0,1\}[/itex]

where [itex]\displaystyle\omega[/itex] belongs to the outcome space [itex]\Omega=\{heads, tails\}[/itex]

After I deciphered the notation, that seemed straightforward enough. But, then under the innocuous subheading:

"Which are the most likely [itex]X(\omega)[/itex], what are they concentrated around, what are their spread?

the book says that to approach those problems, one first collects "good" subsets of [itex]\Omega[/itex] in a class F, where F is a [itex]\sigma[/itex]-field. Such a class is supposed to contain all interesting events. Certainly, {w:X(w)=0}={tail} and {w:X(w)=1}={head} must belong to F, but also the union, difference, and intersection of any events in F and its complement the empty set. If A is an element of F, so is it's complement, and if A,B are elements of F, so are A intersection B, A union B, A union B complement, B union A complement, A intersection B complement, B intersection A complement, etc.

Whaaa? What's all that [itex]\sigma[/itex]-field stuff got to do with the probabilites of X(w)? Also, if A and B are a member of a class F, isn't A union B also automatically a member of the class F, as well as A intersection B, etc.?
 
Last edited:
Take a peek at http://www.math.uconn.edu/~bass/lecture.html. I had a look around amazon and couldn't find anything like a non-rigourous book on the subject, and most of the books seem a bit pricey considering that you'll only be reading one or two chapters from them. Have a look at those notes and see how you get on.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
9K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
13K