Theory of Everything: Water and TOE Explained

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter toe21k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Toe Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of water in relation to the Theory of Everything (TOE). Participants explore unconventional interpretations of water's chemical composition and its implications for existing physical theories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that water is not simply H2O, implying a deeper connection to the Theory of Everything.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the validity of existing physical theories, labeling them as 'questionable.'
  • A participant humorously proposes an alternative chemical formula, H1.5O, and connects it to a particle known as X(3872).
  • It is noted that the apparent missing protons in water can be attributed to quantum mechanical effects that affect visibility in scattering experiments, while maintaining that water is still H2O for chemical purposes.
  • Further contributions suggest that H2O could be viewed as an approximation involving irrational or imaginary numbers, indicating a mathematical generalization of its composition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; multiple competing views are presented regarding the nature of water and its relationship to established physical theories.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on unconventional interpretations of chemical and physical properties, and there are unresolved mathematical implications regarding the proposed generalizations of water's composition.

toe21k
***
* Water & TOE
***

Water is not H20...

What does that mean to Theory of Everything (TOE)?

[?]


http://www.superstringtheory.com/forum/basicboard/messages3/160.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
All the existing physical Theories such as GR, SR, QED, Standard Model, etc. are 'questionable'...

Sounds a bit preachy to me. Off to TD you go.

- Warren
 
H1.5O = ?

H1.5O=?

OOps...

Water H1.5O ~ Particle X(3872)...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The apparent missing protons result from a quantum mechanical effect that makes the protons less visible under certain conditions - scattering experiments. For chemical purposes, water is still H2O.
 
In Search of H2O = ?

Originally posted by mathman
The apparent missing protons result from a quantum mechanical effect that makes the protons less visible under certain conditions - scattering experiments. For chemical purposes, water is still H2O.



H2O is an approximation of

1.?...'s H & 0.?...'s O

Isn't that [?]
 

Similar threads

High School The Many TOE's Theory: Examining the Possibilities
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Automotive Alignment Theory - DIY Help
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
Graduate Can Quantum Gravity Serve as a Theory of Everything?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Graduate Horava Lifshitz Gravity: Theory of Quantum Gravity or TOE? Viable Option?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Graduate Question about the Limitations of Physics
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Graduate Can you explain this 'Theory of Everything' formula?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
25K
Graduate It is possible from the general relativity reach a ToE?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Graduate Statements about TOEs, Theory of TOEs
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Graduate Theory of Everything (TOE) Without a Grand Unified Theory (GUT)
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Graduate The Theory of Everything (string theory)
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K