Is <Z_n\{0},+> a Group Without Zero?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nille40
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Group
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical structure and its classification as a group. It is established that this set cannot be considered a group because it lacks an identity element and is not closed under addition. Specifically, the operation 1 + (-1) results in 0, which is excluded from the set. Therefore, fails to meet the fundamental criteria required for a group.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory, specifically the definition of a group.
  • Familiarity with the concept of identity elements in algebraic structures.
  • Knowledge of closure properties in mathematical operations.
  • Basic comprehension of modular arithmetic, particularly with respect to sets like Z_n.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of groups in abstract algebra.
  • Explore the implications of removing identity elements from algebraic structures.
  • Investigate closure properties in different mathematical contexts.
  • Learn about modular arithmetic and its applications in group theory.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of group theory and its applications.

nille40
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hi!
Let us say we have a group [tex]\langle Z_n \backslash \lbrace 0 \rbrace, \cdot \rangle[\tex] and one element multiplied with another gives kn. n divides kn, so kn equals 0. But we don't have 0 in the set of the group.<br /> <br /> If the tex stuff didn't show up, the group should be<br /> <Z_n\{0},+><br /> <br /> Is this then not a group?<br /> Nille[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by nille40


Is this then not a group?
Nille

You re damn straight its not a group! a group contains the identity! remove the identity, and you no longer have a group on your hands... but why would you want to go and do something so perverse like remove the identity?
 
Even worse, it's not closed under addition. 1+(-1)=0, which is not an element in the given set.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K