Maclaurin Series for ln(1+e^x) and \frac{x}{(e^x-1)}

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around obtaining the Maclaurin series expansions for the functions ln(1+e^x) and x/(e^x-1). Participants express confusion about the differentiation process and the application of series expansion techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to differentiate the function ln(1+e^x) and express uncertainty about the steps involved, particularly regarding the application of the chain rule and the correct use of differentiation rules.
  • Others suggest using the Maclaurin series definition and question how to combine series for ln(1+x) and e^x.
  • There are discussions about the proper application of the quotient rule for the second function x/(e^x-1) and whether it can be simplified before differentiation.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing their progress and corrections to each other's work. Some guidance has been offered regarding differentiation techniques, but there is no clear consensus on the next steps or final results.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention feeling lost and express uncertainty about their mathematical skills, which may affect their confidence in progressing through the problem. There are indications of confusion regarding the application of differentiation rules and series expansion definitions.

Bucky
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
obtain the maclaurin series expansions of the following:
[tex]ln(1+e^x)[/tex]
ok I am quite lost..i assume you set it equal to f(x) then differentiate..but what happens when you differentiate that?
also question (b) is
[tex]\frac{x}{(e^x-1)}[/tex]
does that work down to
(e^x - 1)^-x ?

and if so..would you then differentiate the whole of the bracket? but then the chain rule comes into use doesn't it? so it would be -x times e^x?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've had a go at the first part of your question, and I think I might have got somewhere with it but I'm not sure, this is what I did...
the maclaurin series for,
[tex]ln(1+x)=x-(0.5x^2)+(0.333x^3)-(0.25x^4)+...[/tex]
[tex]ln(1+y) = y-(0.5y^2)+(0.333y^3)-(0.25y^4)+...[/tex]
[tex]e^x = 1+x+((x^2)/2!)+((x^3)/3!)+...[/tex]
y = e^x
when we combine them, we get something very complicated, but is something like...
Generalised result:
[tex]\ln(1+e^x) = kx+\frac{\(n^2x^2)(-1)^(n-1)}{2!}+\frac{\(n^3x^3)(-1)^(n-1)}{3!}+...[/tex]

At the moment, I can't work out what k is, but I think I might have the rest of it (emphasis on the word think).:biggrin:
btw, I am crap at this maths symbol stuff, so if it comes out dodgy, make the most of it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bucky said:
obtain the maclaurin series expansions of the following:
[tex]ln(1+e^x)[/tex]
ok I am quite lost..i assume you set it equal to f(x) then differentiate..but what happens when you differentiate that?
Do it and find out, follow the definition of a Maclaurin's series. See what you get.
also question (b) is
[tex]\frac{x}{(e^x-1)}[/tex]
does that work down to
(e^x - 1)^-x ?

and if so..would you then differentiate the whole of the bracket? but then the chain rule comes into use doesn't it? so it would be -x times e^x?

No,
[tex]\frac{x}{(e^x-1)}= x (e^x-1)^{-1}[/tex]

use the quotient or product rule, should come out the same.
 
Bucky said:
obtain the maclaurin series expansions of the following:
[tex]ln(1+e^x)[/tex]
ok I am quite lost..i assume you set it equal to f(x) then differentiate..but what happens when you differentiate that?
You could say that f(x) = ln(1+e^x) and then try to find f'(x), f''(x), et cetera. That would be an equivalent problem.

How far have you gotten in trying to differentiate it? Do you remember your rules of differentiation?
 
ok here's how far i got:

f(x) = ln(1+e^x)

f'(x) = (1+e^x)^(-1)

f''(x) = -(1+e^x)^(-2)

f'''(x) = 2(1 + e^x)^(-3)

f^(iv)(x) = -6(1 + e^x)^(-4)

f^(v)(x) = 24(1+e^x)^(-5)

f(0) = ln(2)
f'(0) = 1/2
f''(0) = 4
f'''(0) = 16
f^(iv)(0) = 96
f^(v)(0) = 768but now I am not sure what to do. the notes get a bit hazy at this point
 
Last edited:
Bucky said:
ok here's how far i got:

f(x) = ln(1+e^x)

f'(x) = (1+e^x)^(-1)
No, you haven't used the chain rule: now multiply by the derivative of 1+ ex which is ex:
[tex]f'(x)= \frac{e^x}{1+e^x}[/tex]
f''(x) = -(1+e^x)^(-2)
Since your first derivative was wrong, this is wrong (and it's not even the derivative of (1+ex)-1: again you have not multiplied by the derivative of (1+ ex).
Use the quotient rule: the derivative of [itex]\frac{e^x}{1+e^x}[/itex] is
[tex]\frac{e^x(1+e^x)- e^{2x}}{(1+e^x)^2}= \frac{e^x}{(1+e^x)^2}[/tex]
You should be able to see a pattern.
f'''(x) = 2(1 + e^x)^(-3)

f^(iv)(x) = -6(1 + e^x)^(-4)

f^(v)(x) = 24(1+e^x)^(-5)

f(0) = ln(2)
f'(0) = 1/2
These are correct
f''(0) = 4
f'''(0) = 16
f^(iv)(0) = 96
f^(v)(0) = 768
These are incorrect


but now I am not sure what to do. the notes get a bit hazy at this point
If your notes have the basic formula:
[tex]\Sigma_{n=0}^\infty \frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}x^n[/tex]
it should not be hazy at all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ok I am just rubbish at math it seems..
quotient rule is bottom times differentiated top minus top times differentiated bottom. all divided by bottom squared. right?
so
f'''(x) = (1+e^x)^2 e^x - e^x over
2(1+e^x) + e^x

f'''(x) = e^3x-e^x over
r2+3e^x(latex ftw ¬.¬ )
i get the feeling I am deeply wrong

i read on and i see how this works now, its just differentiating e to the power of stuff (which in practical terms i doubt ill need to know but ho hum..) and applying chain/quotient rules that's getting me.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K