Fractional Calculus and the Riemann Zeta function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on extending the relationship of the Riemann Zeta function, defined for integers n=2,3,..., to complex numbers n in the domain \mathbb{C}\setminus \{1\}, particularly for \Re(n)>1, using fractional integration techniques. The suggested approach involves employing dimensional regularization, a method commonly used in quantum field theory to manage infinities. Participants recommend transforming the integration limits from [0, 1] to encompass the entire real line and utilizing spherical coordinates to simplify the integration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Riemann Zeta function and its properties
  • Familiarity with fractional calculus concepts
  • Knowledge of dimensional regularization techniques in quantum field theory
  • Proficiency in multivariable calculus, particularly integration in spherical coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Research fractional calculus applications in complex analysis
  • Study dimensional regularization methods in quantum field theory
  • Explore spherical coordinates integration techniques
  • Investigate the properties of the Riemann Zeta function in complex domains
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and researchers interested in advanced calculus, particularly those exploring the Riemann Zeta function and its extensions into complex analysis.

benorin
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,442
Reaction score
191
So it is well-known that for [tex]n=2,3,...[/tex] the following equation holds

[tex]\zeta(n)=\int_{x_{n}=0}^{1}\int_{x_{n-1}=0}^{1}\cdot\cdot\cdot\int_{x_{1}=0}^{1}\left(\frac{1}{1-\prod_{k=1}^{n}x_{k}}\right)dx_{1}\cdot\cdot\cdot dx_{n-1}dx_{n}[/tex]

My question is how can this relation be extended to [tex]n\in\mathbb{C}\setminus \{1\}[/tex], or some appreciable subset thereof (e.g. [tex]\Re(n)>1[/tex] using fractional integration?

My bad: meant to post this in the Calculus & Analysis forum.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe you could do it by the "dimensional regularization" method that the physicists use to eliminate cancelling infinities in QFT. The idea is that you write the RHS using a method that works for arbitrary dimensions.

For the problem at hand, you might begin by converting the limits of integration to go over the whole real line instead of from 0 to 1. Then convert to spherical coordinates and hopefully write it in a way that eliminates N from the number of integrals, for example, by integrating the angular part.

Do tell us how when you find out.

Carl
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K