Induction on an inequality involving sequences

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving inequalities involving sequences defined by the recursive relations \(a_{n + 1} = \sqrt{a_n b_n}\) and \(b_{n + 1} = \frac{a_n + b_n}{2}\). Participants confirm that the sequences \({a_n}\) and \({b_n}\) are bounded and monotonic, leading to their convergence. The arithmetic-geometric mean of \(a_1\) and \(b_1\) is established as the common limit of both sequences. The proof involves induction and the monotonic sequence theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of recursive sequences and their properties
  • Familiarity with the arithmetic-geometric mean
  • Knowledge of the monotonic sequence theorem
  • Basic skills in mathematical induction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the arithmetic-geometric mean in detail
  • Learn about the monotonic sequence theorem and its applications
  • Explore advanced techniques in mathematical induction
  • Investigate convergence criteria for sequences in real analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying real analysis, and anyone interested in sequence convergence and inequalities.

Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
I just can't get the following question. Can someone help me out?

Q. Let a < a_1 < b_1 and define [tex]a_{n + 1} = \sqrt {a_n b_n } ,b_{n + 1} = \frac{{a_n + b_n }}{2}[/tex] .

a) Prove that [tex]a_n \le a_{n + 1} \le b_{n + 1} \le b_n[/tex] for all n.
b) Deduce that the sequences {a_n} and {b_n} both converge.
c) Prove that they have the same limit. (This limit is called the arithmetic-geometric mean of a_1 and b_1)

Here are my attempts

b) I'll do this one first. By the result of part 'a' {a_n} is increasing and bounded above by b_n while {b_n} is a decreasing sequence and bounded below by a_n. So by the monotonic sequence theorem both sequences converge. Not sure about the argument there, I might have missed a few important points.

a) There might ways other than induction to do this but I can't think of any. So I need to start off with a specific case.

For n = 1: I can get a_1 <= a_(2) but not the b_(2) <= b_(1) part 'properly' and I can't get the a_2 <= b_2 bit at all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here are a few comments. If 0< a< b then
1) 0< a2< ab so 0< a< [tex]\sqrt{ab}[/tex]
That gives you "a2< a1".
2) 0< a+ b< 2b so 0< (a+b)/2< b.
That gives you "b2< b1".
Now, assume that [tex]a_n \le a_{n + 1} \le b_{n + 1} \le b_n[/tex]
for some k and use the same calculations as above to show that
[tex]a_{n+1} \le a_{n + 2} \le b_{n + 2} \le b_{n+1}[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the help HallsofIvy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K