Divergent series in perturbation theory of quantum field theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of renormalization procedures to divergent series in perturbation theory within quantum field theory. The series is represented as \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a(n)g^{n}\epsilon^{-n}\) with \(\epsilon\) approaching zero. A key point is the necessity of selecting an appropriate regularization scheme, such as implementing a cutoff like exp(-epsilon*n), to manage the divergences. The conversation also highlights the limitations of renormalization in non-renormalizable series.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perturbation theory in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with series convergence and divergence
  • Knowledge of regularization techniques in quantum physics
  • Basic grasp of renormalization procedures
NEXT STEPS
  • Research various regularization schemes in quantum field theory
  • Study the implications of different cutoff methods on perturbation series
  • Explore the concept of non-renormalizable theories and their characteristics
  • Learn about the mathematical foundations of renormalization group equations
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, theoretical physicists, and advanced students studying quantum field theory and its mathematical frameworks.

eljose
Messages
484
Reaction score
0
if we know that the divergent series in perturbation theory of quantum field theory goes in the form:

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a(n)g^{n}\epsilon^{-n}[/tex] with

[tex]\epsilon\rightarrow{0}[/tex]

then ..how would we apply the renormalization procedure to eliminate the divergences and obtain finite results?...why can not this be done to NOn-renormalizable series?..thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok first of all you are abusing terminology a little bit.

What you want to do is first and foremost, choose a regularization scheme.

Namely, pick a cutoff on that infinite series. The details of the renormalization process depends crucially on the details of which type of cutoff you pick.
 
I would not chose this cutoff. Chose something like exp(-epsilon*n)
If esilon-->0 then exp(-epsilon*n)=1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K