pivoxa15
- 2,250
- 1
why does the energy-liberating fusion process ends with the formation of iron and not heavier elements such as uranium?
The discussion revolves around the energy-liberating fusion processes in stars, specifically why fusion ends with the formation of iron rather than heavier elements like uranium. Participants explore concepts related to nuclear binding energy and the forces at play within atomic nuclei.
Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the underlying reasons for the behavior of fusion processes, with no consensus reached on a definitive explanation. Some agree on the role of nuclear binding energy, while others highlight the complexity of the forces involved.
There are limitations in the discussion regarding the depth of knowledge about nuclear physics among participants, and some assumptions about the nature of nuclear forces and stability are not fully explored.
Look at the nuclear binding energy. There's a maximum around iron.
The answer seems to lie in the difference between the Electromagnetic force and the Strong Force. The EM force has an infinite range and works to push all of the protrons in the nucleus apart. The Strong Force is ~20 times stronger and tries to pull all of the protons and neutrons together, but it's range is extremely short, ~10-15 meters.Entropy said:I think he understands that, he wants to know why. I personally don't know enough about nuclear physics to answer your question. I'm not even sure if nuclear physicists know.