Dividing a 5-Square Cross into 4 Equal Squares

  • Thread starter Thread starter vaishakh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cross Squares
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves dividing a figure made up of five equal squares arranged in a cross shape into four equal parts that can be reassembled to form a square. The subject area relates to geometry and spatial reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the meaning of "equal" in the context of the problem, questioning whether it refers to congruence or area. There are attempts to calculate the dimensions of the resulting square based on the area of the original figure. Some participants share their interpretations and proposed solutions, while others critique the equality of the parts in suggested dissections.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided diagrams and links to visual aids, while others have pointed out potential errors in previous contributions. There is no explicit consensus on a solution yet.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of pending approvals for attachments, which may limit the sharing of visual aids. Participants are also navigating the implications of the question's wording regarding the equality of the parts.

vaishakh
Messages
334
Reaction score
0
A figure contains five equal squares in the form of a cross. Can you show how to divide this figure into four equal parts which will fit together to form a square
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By "equal" do you mean "congruent" or "equal in area"?
 
Tricky. If the five original squares are unit squares, then the area of the square you have to form from them is 5. So the sides would have to be sqrt(5) long = 2.236 approximately. Here's a way you might do it - but the diagram isn't to scale.
 

Attachments

  • Image1.gif
    Image1.gif
    2 KB · Views: 628
I posted the solution to this the other day but for some reason it has been removed, here it is again, not sure if it is the same as Ceptimus' as his attatchment is still pending.
 
The question said 'four equal parts'. Joffe's disection is ingenious, but the parts aren't equal.

As my attachment approval is still pending, here is a link to the same image hosted elsewhere.

http://www.mround.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/physics/image/disection.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Aha, I didn't read the question carefully enough, thanks for pointing that out Ceptimus. Whichever moderator deleted I think should have instead pointed out my error or at least PM'd me, rather rude I feel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K