How Do You Parametrize y = x^2 for Physics Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter philipc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the parametrization of the function y = x^2 for a physics problem involving work done by a force along a parabolic path. The original poster seeks clarification on how to properly parametrize the curve and determine the limits of integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the correct form of the parametrization, with one suggesting a vector representation and questioning the relationship between the parameter t and the coordinates x and y. Others reflect on their own experiences with similar concepts in calculus courses.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the parametrization process and sharing their educational backgrounds. There is no explicit consensus yet, but some helpful guidance has been offered regarding the general approach to parametrizing functions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the original poster's uncertainty about their mathematical foundation and the level of math where these concepts are typically introduced, indicating a potential gap in knowledge that may affect their understanding of the problem.

philipc
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
How would one might parametrize y = x^2

Here is the problem

"an object moves along the parabola y = x^2 from (0,0) to (2,4). One of the forces acting on the object is F(x,y) = (x+2y)i + (2x+y)j. Calculate the work done by F."

the soluction manual has r(t) = ui + u2j -- [0,2]
I forgot how to parametrize this type of function(y = x^2), and how to get the limits of integration of [0,2]?
Thanks
Philip
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the soluction manual has r(t) = ui + u2j -- [0,2]

No it didn't; it probably had something like [itex]\mathbf{r}(t) = t \mathbf{i} + t^2 \mathbf{j}\; -- \; [0, 2][/itex] though. What are the [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]y[/itex] components of [itex]r[/itex] as a function of [itex]t[/itex]? How does the range of [itex]t[/itex] compare to the ranges of [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]y[/itex]? Does that give you any ideas how one might, in general, parametrize the curve [itex]y=f(x) \; \mbox{from} \; (a, f(a)) \; \mbox{to} \; (b, f(b))[/itex]?
 
Last edited:
Hurkly,
Sorry I forgot the "^", yes you were right. You would have to forgive me, being an "elder" student, I don't remember a thing from the past, so my foundation in math is a bit weak. Can you give me what level of math that material may have been covered? That way I can do some reading on it.
Thanks for your help,
Philip
 
I first saw simple parameterizations, functions and circles, in my university's Calculus1 course. They appeared again, fairly extensively, in my Multivariable Calculus course.

When you have a function defined as y in terms of x, the simple parameterization is to let x=t, then y=f(t). This gives
r(t)=<t, f(t)> as the position vector.

You will then obtain the limits, in terms of t, from the beginning and ending values of x, since x = t.

I'm sure someone will give you a more rigorous explanation, but I hope this helps.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K