Is the Set of Cosine and Polynomial Functions Dense in C(S, ℝ)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oxymoron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the density of the set of cosine and polynomial functions in the space of continuous functions C(S, ℝ), where S is defined as the rectangle [0, π] × [0, 1]. The initial assertion is that the subset of functions formed by linear combinations of cos(mx)y^n is not dense, as it cannot approximate functions like sin(x). However, it is concluded that a different subset, consisting of polynomial combinations, is dense in C(S, ℝ). The discussion also highlights that certain combinations, such as x^{5m}y^{2n}, are not dense due to missing terms, which prevents them from approximating every surface in the bounded region.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier analysis and its implications on function approximation.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of density in function spaces.
  • Knowledge of polynomial functions and their properties.
  • Basic grasp of continuous functions and the topology of C(S, ℝ).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Fourier series and their role in approximating continuous functions.
  • Research the concept of density in function spaces, particularly in C(S, ℝ).
  • Explore polynomial approximation techniques and the Weierstrass approximation theorem.
  • Investigate specific examples of functions in C(S, ℝ) that are not expressible as products of functions of x and y.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of analysis, and anyone interested in functional approximation and the properties of continuous functions in bounded domains.

Oxymoron
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
Question

Let [itex]S = \{(x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2\,:\,x\in[0,\pi],\,y\in[0,1]\}[/itex]. Deduce whether or not,

[tex]\left\{\sum_{m,n=0}^M a_{m,n}\cos(mx)y^n\,:\,a_{m,n} \in \mathbb{R}\right\}[/tex]

a subset of [itex]C(S,\mathbb{R})[/itex] is dense.



I was thinking no. And this is not a guess.

My reasoning is as follows. S can be thought of as some 'surface' whose projection onto the real plane is bounded by the rectangle [itex][0,\pi] \times [0,1][/itex].

So, I was led to believe this is kind of like a Fourier analysis problem. Can I construct every possible surface, hence making it dense, using my subset. Well, obviously no, because, for example, I cannot approximate [itex]\sin[/itex] using just linear combinations of [itex]\cos[/itex].

However, let's just say that our subset was

[tex]\left\{\sum_{m=0}^M\sum_{n=0}^N\,a_{m,n}x^my^n\,:\,a_{m,n} \in \mathbb{R}\right\}[/tex]

Then I can approximate, by sums, every possible 'surface', or polynomial using the given subset. So I would say that this particular subset IS dense in [itex]C(S,\mathbb{R})[/itex].

Let's change it a little more. Consider the subset

[tex]\left\{\sum_{m=0}^M\sum_{n=0}^N\,a_{m,n}x^{5m}y^{2n}\,:\,a_{m,n} \in \mathbb{R}\right\}[/tex]

In this case, this subset is NOT dense in [itex]C(S,\mathbb{R})[/itex] because some terms are missing, i.e. 5 and 2 are coprime, so some combinations, i.e. [itex]x^4[/itex] can never be made. That is, this polynomial cannot approximate, by sums, every possible surface within the bounded region. Hence not dense.


I know this is pretty complicated. But if anyone has the guts I would appreciate some feedback.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you have more than just linear combinations of cos. You can linear combinations of cos(mx). cos(2x) = cos²x - sin²x. It's got a 'sin' in there. Of course, it isn't sin itself but can you be sure that no linear combination of cos(mx)'s with m varying will not give you something close to sin? Also, what is M?

For me, it seems like it might be tough to come up with a specific function in C(S,R) and show that none of the functions in your set approximate it. Maybe that's what you'll have to do. To show it's not dense, you want to show that:

There exists f in C(S,R) such that there is an e > 0 such that for all g in your set, there is some x in S such that |f(x) - g(x)| > e.

If you want to prove it dense:

For each f in C(S,R) and for each e > 0, there is a g in your set such that for all x in S, |f(x) - g(x)| < e.

Well how about this: I think I remember in my QM class saying that you could approximate any single-valued continuous function with the sum of a bunch of cos curves. And you can do any single-valued function with a polynomial. So maybe we should look for functions in C(S,R) that aren't of the form h(x)j(y). Try cos(xy). To be honest, though, I don't really know how to do this question.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K