Prove Squeezing Theorem for n Natural Numbers

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the Squeezing Theorem for natural numbers, specifically focusing on the inequalities involving square roots. Participants explore various proof techniques, including induction, the Mean Value Theorem (MVT), and Taylor series approximations. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and exploration of inequalities.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests proving the inequalities by induction and multiplying by \(\sqrt{n}/\sqrt{n}\).
  • Another participant provides a proof using the MVT, showing that \(2\sqrt{n+1} - 2\sqrt{n} < \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\).
  • Some participants express amusement at the effectiveness of the MVT in simplifying the proof.
  • A later reply discusses evaluating the integer part of a sum involving square roots, proposing that definite integration might provide an approximation.
  • Another participant raises a challenge to prove that the integer part of \((\sqrt{n}+\sqrt{n+1})^2\) is odd, inviting original solutions.
  • One participant critiques the justification of a premise in a proof, suggesting it may not hold for large \(n\), while another counters that the inequality decreases strictly as \(n\) increases.
  • Multiple participants explore the application of Taylor series to the problem, discussing upper and lower bounds for the square root differences.
  • There are references to specific calculations and approximations related to the sum of reciprocals of square roots.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of viewpoints on the proofs and methods discussed, with no clear consensus on a single approach or solution. Some participants agree on the validity of certain techniques, while others raise questions or propose alternative methods.

Contextual Notes

Some arguments depend on the assumptions about the behavior of square roots for large \(n\), and there are unresolved mathematical steps in the proofs presented. The discussion includes various approaches that may not be universally accepted or validated.

hypermonkey2
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Any nice proofs for this?

[tex]2\sqrt{n+1}-2\sqrt{n}<\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}<2\sqrt{n}-2\sqrt{n-1}[/tex]




I hope the tex came out alright. have fun!

ps. n is any natural number.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ill post solution in the morning.
 
I doesn't look that hard if you prove each half by induction, and if first you multiply everything by sqrt(n)/sqrt(n). But then again there could be a catch somewere. If I have time I'll try it.
 
[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> 2\sqrt{n+1} - 2\sqrt{n} &= 2(\sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt{n}) \cdot \frac{\sqrt{n+1} + \sqrt{n}}{\sqrt{n+1} + \sqrt{n}} \\<br /> &= \frac{2}{\sqrt{n+1} + \sqrt{n}} \\<br /> &< \frac{2}{\sqrt{n} + \sqrt{n}} \\<br /> &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]


Alternatively, let [itex]f(x) = \sqrt{x}[/itex], then by the MVT on [n, n+1]:

[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> \frac{\sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt{n}}{1} &= f'(x) \\<br /> &= \frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}}, \text{ with x} \in (n, n+1) \\<br /> &< \frac{1}{2\sqrt{n}}<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]

Second one should be similar.
 
Last edited:
Yes, my solution ressembled the first one. Although, i was very amused at seeing the MVT making such short work of it. nice job. here's the pickle. i forgot the solution to this, ill think about it over the next few days, but have a try:
Using this inequality, evaluate to the [tex]\pm 1[/tex] the integer part of the sum
[tex]1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}+...+\frac{1}{\sqrt{1000000}}[/tex]
any progress, you let me know.
 
hehe, alright, it came back to me, but take a try at it anyways.
 
Finally, here's the cherry on top. Prove that the integer part of the following expression is odd.

[tex](\sqrt{n}+\sqrt{n+1})^2[/tex]

have fun! I am interested in seeing some original solutions as i think there are better ones than the ones i have seen.
 
Last edited:
no takers? i post solutions tomorrow.
 
hypermonkey2 said:
Yes, my solution ressembled the first one. Although, i was very amused at seeing the MVT making such short work of it. nice job. here's the pickle. i forgot the solution to this, ill think about it over the next few days, but have a try:
Using this inequality, evaluate to the [tex]\pm 1[/tex] the integer part of the sum
[tex]1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}+...+\frac{1}{\sqrt{1000000}}[/tex]
any progress, you let me know.
I think some appropriate definite integration of 1/sqrt(x) will give the desired approximation.
 
  • #10
hypermonkey2 said:
Finally, here's the cherry on top. Prove that the integer part of the following expression is odd.
[tex](\sqrt{n}+\sqrt{n+1})^2[/tex]
have fun! I am interested in seeing some original solutions as i think there are better ones than the ones i have seen.
This follows from the following 2 observations:
1.
[tex](\sqrt{n}+\sqrt{n+1})^2 + (\sqrt{n}-\sqrt{n+1})^2 = 4n+2[/tex]
2.
[tex](\sqrt{n}-\sqrt{n+1})^2[/tex] is really small.
 
  • #11
hypermonkey2 said:
Using this inequality, evaluate to the [tex]\pm 1[/tex] the integer part of the sum
[tex]1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}+...+\frac{1}{\sqrt{1000000}}[/tex]
any progress, you let me know.

[tex]2\sum_{k=a}^b\left(\sqrt{k+1}-\sqrt{k}\right)<\sum_{k=a}^b\frac{1}{\sqrt k}<2\sum_{k=a}^b\left(\sqrt{k}-\sqrt{k-1}\right)[/tex]

[tex]2\left(\sqrt{b+1}-\sqrt{a}\right)<\sum_{k=a}^b\frac{1}{\sqrt k}<2\left(\sqrt{b}-\sqrt{a-1}\right)[/tex]

[tex]2\left(\sqrt{1000001}-\sqrt{1}\right)<\sum_{k=1}^{1000000}\frac{1}{\sqrt k}<2\left(\sqrt{1000000}-\sqrt{0}\right)[/tex]

[tex]1998<\sum_{k=1}^{1000000}\frac{1}{\sqrt k}<2000[/tex]

By direct calculation
[tex]1998.5401<\sum_{k=1}^{1000000}\frac{1}{\sqrt k}<1998.5402[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #12
well done, youve saved me a bit of typing! yes that's the solution i have as well.
 
  • #13
redkimchi said:
This follows from the following 2 observations:
1.
[tex](\sqrt{n}+\sqrt{n+1})^2 + (\sqrt{n}-\sqrt{n+1})^2 = 4n+2[/tex]
2.
[tex](\sqrt{n}-\sqrt{n+1})^2[/tex] is really small.

interesting, but i find your second premise a little weak, as in... not justified. it definitely is true though. i could be wrong though, its just what if n is very large?
 
  • #14
hypermonkey2 said:
interesting, but i find your second premise a little weak, as in... not justified. it definitely is true though. i could be wrong though, its just what if n is very large?

It decreases strictly as n increases. In particular, if n>0, [tex]-1<\sqrt n-\sqrt{n+1}<0[/tex]. This gives the desired result.
 
  • #15
CRGreathouse said:
It decreases strictly as n increases. In particular, if n>0, [tex]-1<\sqrt n-\sqrt{n+1}<0[/tex]. This gives the desired result.

interesting! I am curious, is there a nice proof of this inequality?
 
  • #16
The original problem looks like an easy application of Taylor series! The 0-th order approximation is:

[tex] f(x + e) = f(x) + f'(x^*) e[/tex]

for some [itex]x^*[/itex] between x and x+e inclusive.

Letting f be the square root function and e be 1, we have:

[tex] \sqrt{x + 1} - \sqrt{x} = \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x^*}} \leq \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x}}[/tex]

because the rightmost term is an upper bound for the middle term. Letting e = -1, we have:

[tex] \sqrt{x - 1} - \sqrt{x} = - \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x^*}} \geq -\frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x}}[/tex]

because the rightmost term is a lower bound for the middle term. (Note the signs!)

Therefore,

[tex]\sqrt{x+1} - \sqrt{x} \leq \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x}} \leq \sqrt{x} - \sqrt{x - 1}[/tex]

or

[tex]2\sqrt{x+1} - 2\sqrt{x} \leq \frac{1}{\sqrt{x}} \leq 2\sqrt{x} - 2\sqrt{x - 1}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #17
hypermonkey2 said:
interesting! I am curious, is there a nice proof of this inequality?
Yes. It's actually quite easy to see why this is true, since the terms in the middle are consecutive square roots. A formal proof goes something like this:

[tex]\sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt{n} > 0 \text{ is obviously true for } n \in \mathbb{N}[/tex]

It remains to show that:

[tex]\sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt{n} < 1[/tex]

Squaring both sides and playing around, we see that this follows from [itex]n < n+1[/itex].

[tex] n < n+1<br /> \Rightarrow n^2 < n(n+1)<br /> \Rightarrow n < \sqrt{n(n+1)}<br /> \Rightarrow 2n - 2\sqrt{n(n+1)} < 0<br /> \Rightarrow n + 1 - 2\sqrt{n(n+1)} + n < 1<br /> \Rightarrow (\sqrt{n+1} + \sqrt{n})^2 < 1[/tex]

So we have:

[tex] 0 < \sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt{n} < 1<br /> \Rightarrow -1 < \sqrt{n} - \sqrt{n+1} < 0[/tex]
 
  • #18
Hurkyl said:
The original problem looks like an easy application of Taylor series! The 0-th order approximation is:
[tex] f(x + e) = f(x) + f'(x^*) e[/tex]
for some [itex]x^*[/itex] between x and x+e inclusive.
Letting f be the square root function and e be 1, we have:
[tex] \sqrt{x + 1} - \sqrt{x} = \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x^*}} \leq \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x}}[/tex]
because the rightmost term is an upper bound for the middle term. Letting e = -1, we have:
[tex] \sqrt{x - 1} - \sqrt{x} = - \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x^*}} \geq -\frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x}}[/tex]
because the rightmost term is a lower bound for the middle term. (Note the signs!)
Therefore,
[tex]\sqrt{x+1} - \sqrt{x} \leq \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x}} \leq \sqrt{x} - \sqrt{x - 1}[/tex]
or
[tex]2\sqrt{x+1} - 2\sqrt{x} \leq \frac{1}{\sqrt{x}} \leq 2\sqrt{x} - 2\sqrt{x - 1}[/tex]

If you say so, i haven't finished my cal 2 yet unfortunately, hehe. but ill keep it in mind!
 
  • #19
devious_ said:
Yes. It's actually quite easy to see why this is true, since the terms in the middle are consecutive square roots. A formal proof goes something like this:
[tex]\sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt{n} > 0 \text{ is obviously true for } n \in \mathbb{N}[/tex]
It remains to show that:
[tex]\sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt{n} < 1[/tex]
Squaring both sides and playing around, we see that this follows from [itex]n < n+1[/itex].
[tex] n < n+1<br /> \Rightarrow n^2 < n(n+1)<br /> \Rightarrow n < \sqrt{n(n+1)}<br /> \Rightarrow 2n - 2\sqrt{n(n+1)} < 0<br /> \Rightarrow n + 1 - 2\sqrt{n(n+1)} + n < 1<br /> \Rightarrow (\sqrt{n+1} + \sqrt{n})^2 < 1[/tex]
So we have:
[tex] 0 < \sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt{n} < 1<br /> \Rightarrow -1 < \sqrt{n} - \sqrt{n+1} < 0[/tex]
oustanding, thanks for that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K