Is Water Flow from a Barrel an Example of Exponential Decay?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the height of water in a barrel and the time it takes for the water to flow out through a small hole. Participants explore whether this relationship can be modeled as exponential decay, particularly focusing on the factors influencing the rate of water flow, including pressure and hole size.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Cristi proposes that the rate of change of the water height can be modeled by the equation dh/dt = -kh, suggesting an exponential relationship.
  • Another participant provides a link to a resource that contradicts Cristi's theory, indicating that there is a finite time after which the barrel will be empty.
  • One participant challenges Cristi's model by pointing out that factors such as surface tension and atmospheric pressure must be considered, arguing that these factors would prevent the model from being accurate.
  • There is a question raised about the dependence of the water level change rate on the size of the hole, with Cristi clarifying that he is treating this as a model.
  • A participant suggests using Bernoulli's Law and Archimedes' principle to derive a more accurate expression for the flow rate, providing a detailed mathematical approach to the problem.
  • The same participant concludes that the derived expression does not align with Cristi's desired exponential relationship, leaving open the possibility of errors in their calculations or assumptions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of Cristi's proposed model, with some supporting the need for a more nuanced understanding of the factors involved. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views on the relationship between water flow and height.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in Cristi's model, including the neglect of surface tension and atmospheric pressure, as well as the influence of the hole size on the flow rate. These factors contribute to the complexity of establishing a definitive relationship.

Cristi
I'm doing a research about water flowing from a barrel through a small hole. I am trying to proove that there is an exponential relationship between the height level of the water and the time. This basically implies that
dh/dt= -kh.

In order to do that , I have to prove first that the rate of change of volume remaining in the barrel is proportional to the pressure.
i.e.: dV/dt = -kp. This is the bit were I got quite stuck. If someone could help me with some cool tecky ideas or some adequate sites, I would be gratefull.

And it's good fun to.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Cristi,
here's something on the topic, but it doesn't support your theory. It says there is a definite time after which the barrel is empty.

http://www.svce.ac.in/~msubbu/FM-WebBook/Unit-II/EffluxTime.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are several things your theory

doesn't take into account. One is that water has surface tension, so that the water in the stream syphons out the water in the barrel. Also the atmospheric pressure forces out the water. However, even if you removed all atmospheric pressure the surface tension would insure that the barrel would empty. It would be very annoying in practice if things worked the way you described because every container would have to be pressurized so that it could be emptied. Thank goodness you're wrong this time!
 
Last edited:
Cristi,
Good try but...
Why would you think that the rate of water level change does not depend upon the size of the hole in the barrel?


Creator:wink:
 
Last edited:
"Cristi,
Good try but...
Why would you think that the rate of water level change does not depend upon the size of the hole in the barrel? "

I didnt say it doesn't depent on the size of the hole. And, yes , for starters I am treating this as a model.

Could anyone tell me how to prove that the rate of change of volume in the barrel is proportional to the pressure on the base?

thanks for the site arcnets.
 
Originally posted by Cristi
"Cristi,
Good try but...
Why would you think that the rate of water level change does not depend upon the size of the hole in the barrel? "

I didnt say it doesn't depent on the size of the hole. .

Does that mean you do believe it depends on the size of the hole?
 
I'm no cooper, but I'll give it a try.

Use Bernoulli's Law and Archimedes principle kid.

Patm + 1/2 &rho v2 = const.

A1 * v1 = A2 * v2

At some point you should be able to derive the expression:

1/2 &rho * (v12 - v22) = &rho g * (h2 - h1)

where the subscript 1 represents the point at the bottom of the barrel and the subscript 2 represents the point at the top.

Apply Archimedes principle, and you should be able to reduce the equation even further:

1/2 &rho v12 * (1 - (A1/A2)2) = &rho g h,

where h = h2 - h1.

Take the derivative with respect to time of both sides:

&rho v1 * (dv1/dt) * (1 - (A1/A2)2) = &rho g * dh/dt.

The only component of acceleration associated with velocity v1 should be g downward. So, this express reduces further:

dh/dt = v1 * (1 - (A1/A2)2).

If you want to show an exponential relationship (i.e. dh/dt = -k * h), you must find v1 in terms of h.

v1 = Sqrt[2gh + v2].

Since you said the hole is small, I will take that to mean that the radius of the outlet hole is much smaller than the radius of the barrel (i.e. R1 << R2. In this case we can approximate the previously stated expression as:

v1 = Sqrt[2gh],

and the ratio of areas can go to zero:

A1/A2 = 0.

So, here is your relationship kid:

dh/dt = Sqrt[2gh].

Use it wisely.

eNtRopY

P.S. It doesn't look like the solution you wanted, but maybe I made a mistake somewhere... or maybe that's just another one of life's little tragedies...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K