Rev. Cheeseman's latest activity
-
RRev. Cheeseman replied to the thread B Binary variables (Absolute values).Ok, I'm sorry if I sounds ignorant but the range of value is still 0 to 1, and not from 0 to 1 and then 2. Correct?
-
RRev. Cheeseman posted the thread B Binary variables (Absolute values) in Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics.Hello, According to https://www.fico.com/fico-xpress-optimization/docs/latest/mipform/dhtml/chap2s1.html?scroll=ssecabsval the formula...
-
RRev. Cheeseman replied to the thread B Are both of these the same thing? (logical NOT and the complement rule).Sorry for not telling the details. I mean both the favorable event or outcome and the total events or outcomes can be expressed as the...
-
RRev. Cheeseman replied to the thread B Are both of these the same thing? (logical NOT and the complement rule).Thank you. So, the favorable event can be rate, numbers of everything, anything, etc.?
-
RRev. Cheeseman reacted to hutchphd's post in the thread B Are both of these the same thing? (logical NOT and the complement rule) with
Like.
The answer is yes you are correct . Of course the semantics matter very much. This is the probabiliity of assault on some particular... -
RRev. Cheeseman reacted to FactChecker's post in the thread B Are both of these the same thing? (logical NOT and the complement rule) with Like.
That is valid if all the events have an equal probability. Otherwise, it is not valid. It does not represent a probability if you...
-
RRev. Cheeseman replied to the thread B Are both of these the same thing? (logical NOT and the complement rule).Ok. Thanks for the important informations. For population A which is 889 crimes or criminals divided by 15 millions is 0.00005 and for...
-
RRev. Cheeseman replied to the thread B Are both of these the same thing? (logical NOT and the complement rule).Yes, even from your previous calculations for Alaska it is 0.00134 and for Tennessee it is 0.000382. The probability range for Alaska is...
-
RRev. Cheeseman replied to the thread B Are both of these the same thing? (logical NOT and the complement rule).Alright. Let's see if I can formulate a probability question by myself correctly. Say, the numbers of crime in population A which is...
-
RRev. Cheeseman replied to the thread B Are both of these the same thing? (logical NOT and the complement rule).Thank you so much. But in the real world, per capita tells us more details than using probability formula. Is that accurate? Sorry.
-
RRev. Cheeseman reacted to FactChecker's post in the thread B Are both of these the same thing? (logical NOT and the complement rule) with Like.
Suppose R is the event of a particular person being raped, A is the event that the person is in Alaska, and T is the event that the...
-
RRev. Cheeseman replied to the thread B Are both of these the same thing? (logical NOT and the complement rule).Thank you for these responses. I wonder if we can use probability formulas instead of crime per capita (for example in this context...
-
RRev. Cheeseman reacted to FactChecker's post in the thread B Are both of these the same thing? (logical NOT and the complement rule) with Like.
A logical variable is a True/False or a 1/0 variable. Probabilities can have any real value from 0 to 1, including 0 and 1. In other...
-
RRev. Cheeseman replied to the thread B Are both of these the same thing? (logical NOT and the complement rule).Thank you.
-
RRev. Cheeseman reacted to PeroK's post in the thread B Are both of these the same thing? (logical NOT and the complement rule) with Like.
The logical NOT is the same concept as the complement in set theory.