Insights Relativator (Circular Slide-Rule): Simulated with Desmos - Insight

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Relativator, a circular slide rule sold by Atomic Laboratories, Inc., which is linked to Cenco Instruments. Participants express admiration for the device, noting its complexity and advanced features compared to traditional slide rules. The tool is highlighted for its unique capabilities in simulating relativistic calculations using Desmos. Despite its sophistication, some users find it challenging to fully grasp its functionality. Overall, the Relativator is recognized as an impressive and innovative instrument in the realm of physics.
Messages
19,799
Reaction score
10,753
TL;DR
This is an update of my 2006 post (reconstructed in 2014) Relativator: The circular slide-rule for physicists.

This is a circular slide-rule for doing relativistic calculations for elementary particle physics that I learned about from
– an article by Elizabeth Wade ( “Artifact: Relativator”, Symmetry (FNAL/SLAC), 01/01/06
  • Like
Likes sbrothy and Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
What a cool gizmo!! :smile:

EDIT: I mean I thought a slide rule was smart, and I was of course aware that there we're specialized versions, but this one takes the biscuit! Unfortunately it's too advanced for me. Still, I'm flabbergasted! (For the record, the likes was from before this EDIT.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt and robphy
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...

Similar threads