yes, I thought about that one too. But I got confused when I did a bunch of numerical simulations. Sometimes, the sum got very large (>1000). So I worry about the case where the sum may actually diverge: theoretically this is clearly possible (e.g.: sum of 1/n). Do we need to prove that this is...
I choose a random number p_1 \in [0,1) and a subsequent series of (increasingly smaller) random numbers p_i \in [0, p_{i-1}). Then I can calculate the sum \sum_{i=1}^\infty p_i. Naturally, this sum is dependent on the random numbers chosen, so its particular result is not very insightful...
OK, that makes sense. I had originally expected that both roots would converge to -c/b, but now that I think about it, it seems clear that the fact that b can be negative (so that I cannot just say \sqrt{b^2}=b) will spoil this. Oh well... too bad (for what I wanted).
But for the other root, I get:
\frac{-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}=\frac{-b-\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}\cdot \frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}=
\frac{b^2-(b^2-4ac)}{2a(-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac})}=\frac{2c}{-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}
which seems ok... but I don't think it is! After all, I multiply by...
I was wondering someting that is so simple that it baffled me...
When I have the equation
a x^2+b x+c=0
this obviously has the solutions
x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}
And when I have the equation
b x+c=0
this has the solution
x=\frac{-c}{b}
My problem now is the limiting case...
There is some doubt as to weather this video is real at all...
http://www.infowars.com/print/iraq/berg.htm
What do you guys think? Wag the dog all over again?
OK, I think I completed the answer to my own question (great forum, this is! ;-)
This trick is that the website divides the number that I imput by 9 to see what remainder is left.
If it's 0, the missing digit had to be 9.
If it's 1, the missing digit had to be 8.
If it's 2, the missing...
OK, I got slightly further: My number Z=X-Y (X>Y) must be devidable by 9, right?
Is it then just the case that because the website knows that the number I imput plus the unknown digit must be dividable by 9, the value of the unknown digit can be determined? I.E.: Because it knows that the...
Another "play with numbers" website
http://digicc.com/fido/
It's probably related to the fact that we have a base-10 number system, but I fail to see how it works...
This website does the following:
1) You write down a 3 or 4 digit number, say X=x1 x2 x3 x4 (where the x's denote the...
No, this is not correct. You are saying that
\pi + (1-2 i)\pi^2=-1
which would imply that
\pi=\left(\mp\frac{1}{10}\pm\frac{i}{5}\right)\left(\mp 1+\sqrt{8i-3}\right)
which is clearly not the case...
They are a particle: (almost) no mass, no charge, spin 1/2. No electromagnetic or strong interaction, only weak interaction. Typical strength of the interaction: you'd need about 1000 lightyears of lead to have a 50% probability for an interaction between a neutrino and the lead!
On earth...
Hi, thanks for the response.
I don't get the use of trying to find analytical solutions to a part of the problem first. It seems to be a lot of work and I don't see what use they'd have. After all, I am only interested in the numerical outcome (I want to fit the results, to obtain values for...
Can all the non-established "physics" please be moved to the Theory Development subforum (or at least be split off from this thread)?
On-topic:
@pmb_phy: regarding the Proca Lagrangian, is this the most accurate way to determine the upper-limit for the photon mass?
Also, for the revised...
Interesting... the Palastinians seem to have a legitimate claim against Sharon for possible genoside (I think from somewhere in the beginning of the 1980's). So, according to you they should just buy some gunships and blast him - and maybe a few of his children and some bystanders too - when he...
Even if all of this is true, then that STILL doesn't justify his murder in this way. He should have been arrested, tried in an oper court (with all the rules and so on) and he should only have been punished AFTER he had been found guily be an impartial judge (or jury, I have no idea how the...
1905 is Einsteins "magic year": it is the year in which he published special relativity, the resolution of the photoelectric effect (for which he would get the Nobel prize later on), and the theoretical description of Brownian motion (that almost proved beyond doubt the existence of atoms)...
I consider Einstein a genius. Not just because of SR, but also because of GR, the photoelectric effect, his proof of the Brownian motion, his contributions to laser-theory, ... ... ...