Search results

democracy best served? i have a guestion for everyone who wishes to answer. is democracy best served by STRICT separation of churcha and state? i have mixed feelings on this so pleasee tell me what you think so i can figure out my stance. thx.

then you are saying that there is no discrimination of other religions now due to these laws because it would be unconstitutional? because many laws today are based on christian beliefs, religously and morally.

democracy best served?? would democray be best served if the government was strictly separated from the church?? tell me ur views please

thank you for ur view

yes that is true but some democrats and republicans do agree with some things and not all so r u saying that bipartinship requires complete and total agreement because that's not going to happen sorry

"bipartinsanship is the most effective political model to which the United States of america can adhere." what are your views on this??

this would be the best answer but it is in humans nature to seek riches and expand land so each regime would then try to expand causing another or a series of world wars.

did montesquieu have a point when he said that democracy won't work or was he completely ignorant??

so wat would u fit in with this forum u call a zoo??

LUDWIG STATED THAT: I'm trying to make a point here, but you think I'm riding a high horse. Perhaps I'm being too sarcastic; what I'm trying to say is that you don't have to worry about the problems of the world. But if you are going to help people in need, I think giving them money to help them...

r u implying that there can only be one winning 'free' country and the rest should be ignored and left to fend for themselves?

each individual i believe learns from the past in his or her own way but does not learn why there was devastation in the past. and as a society or a whole population, we haven't learned

so u believe that there is no limit to a human brain to comprhend or to process information and store it for later use? or are u implying that mankind will destroy itself in the next century?? :confused: :confused:

this does clear up the question of what logic is but brings a question of, what knowledge do we have and how do extend it??

should we not eat meat and let the animals of the world overpopulate it taking the needed room for our own expanding population?

how do they affect society?

wat of the negative side??

What is MORAL in your definition? how can we judge if we have an obligation without defining what is and isn't MORAL?