Search results

I think the OP had read Isacc Asimov's Book : Flatland, and is looking for repetition in the general populace for those ideas as to whether he accepts these ideas as holding weight. If he reads this: Flatland was a fictional book based off of 1940s ideas of physics. Now obviously we have...

If you think about it the big picture is what physicists are trying to get at. Here is an example: The human body is made up of many different organs. Now, to understand what these organs do and how they interact and support each other we have to study them individually. Once we do that and...

you can imaginatively give 'vacume' any properties you want, but you cannot change the tested facts. kcodon is right, and you cannot look at it as an ocean. It is devoid of matter. Therefore, lacking in material things like mass, weight, pressure, energy, ETC. Yes you are on the right track...

I have found a few sites that contains plans for a hydraulic engine that could run itself for a total of nine days. http://www.rexresearch.com/clemengn/clemengn.htm" [Broken] http://www.keelynet.com/energy/clemindex.htm" [Broken] Would it be practical to use this as an engine.

i recently heard that ups is designing and testing a hydraulic system to power a torque converter for an efficient delivery system i need to know the validity of the situation and the plausibility of it being run by an electrically powered motor.

i am not sure if they are able to interact or not, but i believe that if they are able to interact it would make a profound advancement in the understanding of gravity.

So you are saying an I-Robot senario, but only with source code? It could also be used as an evolutionary factor for a robot's advancement.

actually if it was learning at a geometric rate the program would find ways to hide itself as software in the internet, not just as a metal skeleton, but also as a base program that could adapt itself to any electronic environment even power lines. Its environment would be specifecly broad. We...

cauliflower is a mini version of a forest on a small planet. Why is the color blue blue?

I know what you mean. It does sound right and true, But we have to question everything even if it means putting aside our feelings for a while

but according to entropy all points in time exist at once.

interesting you should have your own forum LOL :rofl:

they are alergic Why do humans say the most obvious things?

i thought force carrying particles were messenger particles that are used in equations. I'm therefore not sure that there is proof of them existing as a state of masslike matter. Please clear this up for me.

This sounds like the properties of the wave of light: As the vibration increases energy is decreased, but as vibration decreases energy is increased. If you substitute acceleration for energy and vibration of wavelength for vibration of matter you get the same result. Correct?

all right you caught me, but we are talking about time here not inertia.

I have never thought of it by those terms. Its a concept that is very easy to grasp. Is the reason for this because we cannot find the remote region that the universe originates from, or because that is the only way we can define infinite expansion?

First, I did not mean an infinutely small center point, but a region that the universe is expanding from. Tony i don't believe that is what we are talking about, but applying human perseption is a part of science. Keep up the good work.

I'm sorry I did not expalin. I simply ment that the forces that arise from normal spatial situations should arise from within the black hole. Correct me if I'm wrong please.

hittting a wall is only an effect of inertia. we can divide mass by volume to get density, so we obvioulsy can divide time into some quantative value. By my experience time is continuall due to human perseption, but it is continuous at a rate. This states that time can be split into values such...

Are you saying that the whole states of atoms can be converted from one place to another, and move through objects like they were rocks going through air?

Well, if you look at time in Relativity, time is able to be distorted. This, for me, is proof enough that it is real.

If you take energy from an energy system at a local point, such as the casmir effect, shouldn't energy be converted from the system? Could you then find the place in the system that the energy was taken from, and use equations to find the path of the loss of energy. Almost like you would figure...

sry i did mean galaxy In the Big Bang Theory there is a central origination point correct? If yes then.. 1)There should be a central point for all to originate from. 2)Everything would expand from that point. Correct?

Yes, new forces could arise, but shouldn't they be the same as the forces we feel and don't feel here today?

Energy can not be created or destroyed, only converted. Is that the one? This would cause a very hard dilema. We might be able to find where the casmir effect originates if the device was ever created, or destroy our veiw of physics all together.

I am not sure, but it seems possible. Alternate dimensions is not in my list of interests.

so then there is a conseivable risk correct?

Well then what would be the forst law that russ_watters was talking about earlier?

Then why are there burning underground coal mines?

Now any other ideas?

could it be that the casmir effect is present due to the strong cohesive properties of metal? Could cohesive properties be pulling the metal sheets together? Does anyone think we could harvest this energy in any other way than already stated, and what would be the first law?

Without the air all we are doing is creating another way to fly, but only in our atmosphere. Please give me a way to counteract gravity in a vacuum. Otherwise we do not have antigravity.

I-Robot by Isaac Asimov also

Exactly where would i find information about these field potential symetries? I have looked for them and have not been able to find them. Could you please provide me with the information for reveiw, so I could expand my thinking on this subject. Thank you Juju, avemt1

What would this inflatrionary field be regulated by? The outer charge, and what if the charge is strong enough to pull the field to the event horizon. SRY, curiosity is my bane.

All i see is using an electric corona to create an ionic air flow that pushes down. Is there any proof of this idea working in a vacum?

Although relativity defines gravity as a curve, it is possible that it is a 'pressure' difference causing a force caused by the diffusion of space. That is my idea. Proof would be in finding out if light does change speeds traveling through different 'energy-densities' (or gravity strength...

wrong read this http://www.physicspost.com/articles.php?articleId=114&page=1 [Broken]

I have a consern. If we are taking oil, coal, and other natural resources from the Earth that have a large chemical energy due to hydrocarbons, then 100,000 or more years from now when they are supposed to slide under the surface of the earth, will our core start to lose enough of it's kenetic...

"everything has to take life to keep life" Is this a fundamental rule of existence? It seems so in my point of veiw. My feelings on this thread are that all the quotes, taking thirty two pages, have been a total waste to the point. We need to stick to the scientific method even in the most...

I think we should use this oportunity to state the duality of the situation. Humans were made to be omnivores, but we are also ment to empathise and rationalize. We are doing this now. We can argue about it and make logical standpoints, or we can do the right thing. IF ANYBODY IS WORRIED ABOUT...

The main theory is that we are spiraling tward the center of the universe. Gravity itself causes acceleration.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=12226 This is one of my theory sites, and it has a link to the scientific american artice 'OUT OF THE DARKNESS' I am sure that this would be very healpful to you. If you have any more questions my e-mail is avemt1@yahoo.com I am 18...

Due to the much expected article of Scientific American Magazine 'Out of the Darkness'. I am retiring this glorious theory development, and am at my wits end to the magnitude and loss my soul has taken. The article states my theory perfectly, and i did not use mathematics. Just cognitive...

tecnically \frac{\chi} {\infty}=0 (sorry first time) theorems: any finite digit divided by infinity is = to zero any difined digit divided by itself is = to one

I do understand the mathematical deffinition of infinity now, and I do realize that infinity can not be treated, in any way like a variable. Somewhere down the line the denomenator would become infinitely small, and never reach 1/0,and the solution would be infinitely large, and not be able...

sorry-- I didn't explain infinity divided by infinity it is an algebraic function I was merely visualizing the numberline as a whole. I isolated the denomenators

Yes, and when time stopps we will percieve that it has stopped and the discovery will be made. TIME HAS STOPPED. It will be broadcasted over the entire world network next year. HA HA YEAH RIGHT... we cannot percieve time as stopping, because we would stop percieving in the process of time...

I have come up with my own theory, but only from minimal knowledge of the subject, it does not defy relativity, the definition of forces, but it does define the effect of gravity as a multiple functioning force that interacts with space fabric to make a diffusive pull. It also helps to explain...