Search results for query: *

I have noticed a thread on some philosphy forums claiming there is somehting called "simulatenous causality" where an outcome and its cause occurr at the same time. It has been claimed that entanglement is an example of this. Your answer woudl seem to imply that this is not correct, do you...

and hence traditional notions of causality are undemrined as there can be no cause if the underlying particles are identical?

If I fire photons at a glass, some will be reflected back and some will go through. Which ones is by deifnition random, sincee all photons are exactly alike. Is this correct?