Exploring the Implications of LQG on Photons

  • Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Light
In summary, LQG predicts that more energetic photons should travel ever so slightly faster than less energetic photons. This is something that might be tested in the near-term with gamma ray burst observations. It does not seem to contradict the postulate in relativity that the speed of light is constant.
  • #1
MathematicalPhysicist
Gold Member
4,699
371
the next statement was in wikipedia:"LQG predicts that more energetic photons should travel ever so slightly faster than less energetic photons. "
does it imply faster than light speed? (i don't think so because lqg attempts to unite between GR and QM).

here's the link:http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_quantum_gravity
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Originally posted by loop quantum gravity
the next statement was in wikipedia:"LQG predicts that more energetic photons should travel ever so slightly faster than less energetic photons. "
does it imply faster than light speed? (i don't think so because lqg attempts to unite between GR and QM).

here's the link:http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_quantum_gravity

This is right. The ongoing experimental tests of LQG and some expected in the near-term future are discussed on pages 18-20
of Smolin's recent review article
http://arxiv.org/hep-th/0303185 [Broken]

This is a very interesting section of the survey called
"The near term experimental situation"

The predicted dispersion is so slight that it can only be tested over cosmological distances using very high energy photons so the most promising method is by observing gamma ray bursts (GRB). Smolin gives these references:

G. Amelino-Camelia, John Ellis, et al "Potential Sensitivity of Gamma-Ray Burster Observations to Wave Dispersion in Vacuo
http://arxiv.org/astro-ph/9712103 [Broken] (published in Nature in 1998)

J. P. Norris et al "GLAST, GRBs, and Quantum Gravity"
http://arxiv.org/astro-ph/9912136 [Broken]

John Ellis et al "Quantum Gravity Analysis of Gamma-Ray Bursts using Wavelets"
http://arxiv.org/astro-ph/0210124 [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
doesnt this dissobey the postulate in relativity that the speed of light is constant?
 
  • #4
the dispersion relation

This is a fascinating area. It is not unreasonable to expect physics at Planck scale (e.g. very high energies, small distances) to diverge from the everyday and classical. But there is a scarcity of ways to test LQG because the Planck scale is so small and so high-energy.
One cannot just build an accelerator to get things up to Planck energy, it is too high!
But by being clever one can nevertheless find ways to test the theory. And already people are doing that! Here is what Smolin says on page 17,

"It turns out that this has consequences for the question of whether special relativity, and lorentz invariance, is exactly true in nature, or is only an approximation which holds on scales much longer than the Planck scale [28]-[40]. Several recent calculations...yield predictions for modifications to the energy momentum relations for elementary particles. These are of the form,

E2 = p2 + M2 + αE3 + βE4

where predictions have been found for the leading coefficients α, which generally depend on spin and helicity [36]-[38]..."

The GRB observations are trying to find a bound on this α parameter.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Originally posted by loop quantum gravity
doesnt this dissobey the postulate in relativity that the speed of light is constant?

It certainly does. I would assume that only the low-energy limit is constant. This is true about several basic constant---there is divergence from them at very high energy or at very small scale.
The postulates of special relativity are not sacred and
even in general relativity already one finds that special relativity is just a very good local approximation.

so there are some very tiny divergences which it looks like it will be possible to test maybe even within the next 5 years
 
  • #6


When I quoted from Smolin just now I left out some units, Planck length lPl and Planck area l2Pl Here is the same thing with these very small quantities inserted,

"It turns out that this has consequences for the question of whether special relativity, and lorentz invariance, is exactly true in nature, or is only an approximation which holds on scales much longer than the Planck scale [28]-[40]. Several recent calculations...yield predictions for modifications to the energy momentum relations for elementary particles. These are of the form,

E2 = p2 + M2 + αlPl E3 + β l2Pl E4

where predictions have been found for the leading coefficients α, which generally depend on spin and helicity [36]-[38]..."

I gather that the predicted values of alpha are no larger than order one. So since alpha gets multiplied by Planck length, in the energy momentum relation, and Planck length is around 10-35 in metric terms, the effect is miniscule. One apparently only expects it to show up in high energy light that has traveled very long distances (to allow for higher energy photons to get slightly ahead of the pack). The situation is reminiscent of back around 1919 when Eddington went and measured the bending of light around the sun during an eclipse. But so far the observations of gamma ray bursts are not sufficiently precise, so we have to wait.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
another thing doesn't lqg contradicts itself by predicting a speed greater than the speed of light (because one of it's parts are GR and its postulate that the speed of light is constant)?
 

1. What is LQG and how does it relate to photons?

LQG stands for Loop Quantum Gravity, which is a theory that attempts to reconcile quantum mechanics and general relativity. It proposes that space and time are made up of discrete, indivisible units called "quanta". Photons, being particles of light, are affected by the curvature of space-time as described by general relativity, and LQG provides a framework for understanding this interaction at a quantum level.

2. How does LQG impact our understanding of photons?

LQG allows us to understand the behavior of photons in a more fundamental way, by considering the discrete nature of space-time and how it affects the movement of these particles. It also provides a more complete understanding of the relationship between quantum mechanics and general relativity, which are two fundamental theories of physics that have been difficult to reconcile.

3. What are some potential implications of LQG on photons?

One potential implication of LQG on photons is the possibility of a minimum wavelength for photons, similar to the Planck length that is proposed in LQG. This could have implications for our understanding of the nature of light and how it behaves in different environments. LQG could also potentially provide insights into the behavior of photons in extreme conditions, such as near black holes.

4. How does LQG differ from other theories that attempt to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity?

LQG differs from other theories, such as string theory, in that it is a background independent theory. This means that it does not rely on a fixed background space-time, but rather considers space-time itself as a dynamic and quantized entity. LQG also differs in its approach to quantizing gravity, using techniques from loop quantum geometry rather than the more traditional methods used in string theory.

5. What are some current areas of research on the implications of LQG on photons?

Current areas of research include using LQG to study the behavior of photons in cosmological models, as well as exploring the potential for experimental tests of LQG predictions related to photons. There is also ongoing research on the potential implications of LQG on other particles, such as fermions and gravitons, and their interactions with photons.

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
718
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top