Cooling High-Temperature Copper Conductors

In summary, Andronicus1717 is researching a way to cool a copper tube that is reaching temperatures up to 100 degrees Celsius. He is looking for a coolant or gas that can cool the tube quickly, and he is considering water. He is also looking into using other cooling methods, but is not sure if a conducting material would be a problem. If you have a length of copper tube that is 6240 meter equivalent, water will remove 7 kW of heat.
  • #1
origen87
25
0
Hello all,
I am doing a research which involves hollow copper conductors. I would like to know about some kind of coolant or gas (like SF6) which can be passed through the copper tube to cool it, the temperature of the copper conductor can reach upto 100 degree C. The coolant should cool the conductor quickly so as the temperature at any point should not go high.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think more information is needed to get a good answer to your question... heat flux? is it localized? required response time? You mentioned SF6 so do you truly need a nonconducting material?

Water is a typical coolant for induction heating coils which sound similar to what little you've described from your setup. As for gases, helium is a good heat transfer fluid. Thermal conductivity is the material property you are interested in for gases. If the required response time is low you can make just about any gas work by adjusting the flow rate, SF6 included.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
I would look into using water. It makes for an excellent coolant.
 
  • #4
@Andronicus1717...
Well I actually don't have values for the heat flux n response time. But the setup goes lik this. It's a 1560 metre coiled copper tube, which will hav current upto 200A, so i^2R losses wil heat up the tube. As I am not using any other cooling means for the coil. I want to pass some gas or coolant so that this heat produced can be fully absorbed continously. I am not sure about the coolant being a conducting material or not,as the copper tube wil conduct, will it be a problem if conducting material is used inside the tube?
 
  • #5
That is a long tube! What is the inner diameter of the tube? Does the setup require only 1 inlet and 1 outlet or is there room for supplementary inlets and outlets along the length of tube?

With that length of tube you are going to run into large pressure losses due to friction along the entire length of the pipe.
 
  • #6
Are the tubes insulated? If they aren't, you may not even need a coolant gas? Free convection or forced convection on the outside of the tube may take care of the heat problem.
Just the resistances from first entry at http://www.stormcopper.com/CopperTubing.htm gives me about 4.5 Watts per meter of tube if my math is right.
 
  • #7
Can you provide ID of tube, and estimate on heat flux per unit length? Also, is this in air or insulated?
 
  • #8
1 inlet n 1 outlet will do_OD=8.65mm and ID=8mm.6 such layers of coil are wound on top of each odr,between these layers we are planning to have NOMEX paper covering.And the hollow copper will also be covered with PICC insulation.
 
  • #9
Annealed copper has a stress allowable of 6000 psi giving your tube an MAWP of roughly 450 psig. So let's assume we can allow a max 400 psi drop in pressure from inlet to outlet (I'll use 200 psi). Flow rate for this tube is affected not just by length but also by the turns, so let's use 4 times the 1560 meters (6240 meter equivalent length). Rough calculation for water inlet 40 F and 400 psig with outlet 200 psig and 210 F gives 0.04 lbm/sec. Heat that can be removed with this much water is roughly 7 kW.

If I use 4.5 W/meter as given by Andronicus1717, total heat rejection needed is roughly 7 kW.

Looks like water might work.
 
  • #10
according to my calculations heat loss due to i^2 r loss would be no more than 6kW.
but will there be problems because of water inside the conducting tube?and is there any related calculations to find out how much water can be absorbed by water?.and can continuous expansion and contraction of water help keep the temperature of water low enuf?
 
  • #11
Hi origen87,
origen87 said:
according to my calculations heat loss due to i^2 r loss would be no more than 6kW.
but will there be problems because of water inside the conducting tube?and is there any related calculations to find out how much water can be absorbed by water?.and can continuous expansion and contraction of water help keep the temperature of water low enuf?
If you calculate 6 kW and the value from Andronicus1717 gives 7 kW, then we're probably in the ball park. Without much better info, I wouldn't put money on a more exact figure.

I don't know enough about electricity to tell you how the water would affect the electric current, but I'd be surprised if there were an issue. That might be worth getting another opinion on.

Note that conservation of mass says that the mass flow rate of water going into your tube must come out of the tube, so there's no water being "absorbed". The flow is roughly 0.04 lbm/sec or 0.29 GPM.

Also, the water will gradually warm from 40 F to 210 F (aprox) as it flows along the tube. There is no expansion and contraction that affects the temperature. The 6 or 7 kW will heat the flow of water from 40 to 210 F continuously. How you get 40 F water or if the temperature can be higher than that will require someone to look at the details of what you're doing.

In the end, you need an engineer to look at the details of your design and determine how to make it work, but at least at this point, it looks feasible to use water at a few hundred psi to cool the conductor. If you'd like more detail than that, I'll have to charge you a consulting fee. :biggrin: $$$
 
  • #12
hey thanks a lot man,,,the info u provided without consultation fee ;) was very helpful:)...
 
  • #13
to origen's question:

Hydrogen is the best gas coolant by far because of high thermal conductivity, high sonic speed. It us often or usually used in large power plant generators because of low "windage" loss.

In GE enerators used in a plant my father worked in in '50s it was circulated through heat exchangers with blowers.

In small amounts not a fire hazard etc. Also if you want automatic leakage replacement upu can make an electrolysis cell using battery acid (10% H2SO4) and you only replace the water just like for a car battery.
 
  • #14
@Q_Goest
how did u come to that figure of 200-400 psi,which equation did you use?what was the flow rate you choose?
after all the calculations the total losses came upto 12kW,hence a flow rate of 38.1*10^-6 m^3/sec has 2 b used 2 cool the conductor(water at 25C)...if that flow rate has to be achieved the ID of the conductor should be increased to 30mm or more.
 
  • #15
origen87 said:
@Q_Goest
how did u come to that figure of 200-400 psi,which equation did you use?what was the flow rate you choose?
after all the calculations the total losses came upto 12kW,hence a flow rate of 38.1*10^-6 m^3/sec has 2 b used 2 cool the conductor(water at 25C)...if that flow rate has to be achieved the ID of the conductor should be increased to 30mm or more.
I'm using the Darcy Weisbach equation. If power goes to 12 kW, a more reasonable diameter might be 0.5 inches ID with a water flow rate of ~ 0.114 lbm/sec. This would give you a 100 degree F delta between inlet and outlet with a pressure drop of around 250 to 300 psi.

Note that hydrogen as suggested by cpooley is about as good a gas as you could get for cooling, but it doesn't come close to having the cooling capacity of water. DI water seems to be a good solution that's economical and safe.
 
  • #16
Q Goest: Note topic was Gas Cooling. Of course H2O usually will be more effective. So would be sodium or the NaK eutectic. But he was asking re gas.

For temps over 500 C, decomposition of NH3 may be effective, if the products go somewhare, like into a rocket engine (1st Microlauncher Stage 3 design)
 
  • #17
dont you think Hazen-Williams formula would be a better option
 
  • #18
Crane TP #410 is the bible in the industry. They recommend Darcy Weisbach.
 

1. How does cooling affect the performance of high-temperature copper conductors?

Cooling is essential for maintaining the integrity and efficiency of high-temperature copper conductors. As the temperature of the conductor increases, its resistance also increases, causing a decrease in performance. Cooling helps to reduce the temperature and therefore the resistance, allowing the conductor to function optimally.

2. What methods can be used for cooling high-temperature copper conductors?

There are several methods that can be used for cooling high-temperature copper conductors. These include air cooling, liquid cooling, and forced convection cooling. Air cooling is the most common and cost-effective method, while liquid cooling is more efficient but also more expensive. Forced convection cooling involves using a fan or pump to circulate air or liquid around the conductor for better cooling.

3. Are there any safety concerns when cooling high-temperature copper conductors?

Yes, there are safety concerns when cooling high-temperature copper conductors. The cooling system must be designed and installed properly to prevent any potential hazards, such as electrical shocks or fires. It is important to follow safety standards and regulations when handling and cooling high-temperature copper conductors.

4. Can the cooling method affect the lifespan of high-temperature copper conductors?

Yes, the cooling method can greatly affect the lifespan of high-temperature copper conductors. If the conductor is not properly cooled, it can overheat and degrade quickly, leading to a shorter lifespan. On the other hand, if the cooling method is too extreme, it can also cause damage to the conductor. It is important to find the right balance of cooling to ensure the longevity of the conductor.

5. How can I determine the appropriate cooling method for my high-temperature copper conductors?

The appropriate cooling method for high-temperature copper conductors depends on various factors, such as the operating temperature, the amount of heat produced, and the environment. It is best to consult with an expert or conduct thorough research to determine the most suitable cooling method for your specific application. Factors such as cost, efficiency, and safety should also be considered when choosing a cooling method.

Similar threads

  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
40
Views
767
Replies
1
Views
688
Replies
2
Views
989
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
12
Views
437
Replies
19
Views
1K
Back
Top