Exploring OS 012: A Ternary Logic Approach to Quantifying Conflict and Dialogue

  • Thread starter Moonrat
  • Start date
In summary, the author is writing a book about OS 012, a dialectic that was created by people discussing war before the invasion of Iraq. He would like to have some feedback from the community, and would love for people to challenge him and each other with the dialectic.
  • #1
Moonrat
171
0
Wow, hello all, I stumbled across this BBS while doing research on 'ternary math sets' for a book I am writing.

You now have given me some wonderful reading for my off time pleasure, thank you!

Anyway, I was curious if I could gain the help from a few adventurous minds here.

I am writing a book about OS 012. OS 012 is a internet dialectic that was created by people discussing war before the invasion of Iraq.

It is based on a ternary number set and can quantify conflict and dialouge with surprising accuracy.

I would love to have some feedback a bit about this idea from some of you and maybe engage in an OS 012 dialouge so you all can see how it works..

I would love you all to challenge it and challenge me a bit with it, and who knows, maybe some of these discussions will wind up in the book...

Any takers?

Is this the right forum for this? ( I would assume because dialectic is a tool of philosoph, but OS 012 is NOT a philosophy at all)



thank you in advance and look forward to some rather stimulating conversation..

Moonrat

Oh, here is OS 012, but please, this is the beta site and, well, don't worry about the presentation , it's a little tongue in cheek and some people miss that. I am still figuring out the proper way to present it

OS 012
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The pre-Iraq invasion discussion was something like this.

The US accuses the Iraq govt. of still having weapons of mass destruction.
Iraq could not produce "evidence" of not having such weapons.
That is why the US invaded Iraq.

What was wrong with this?

It is "false" jurisdiction. Someone has to be proven guilty beyond doubt, before that someone (or state) can be sentenced guilty.

The US did not provide evidence beyond doubt, in fact part of their "evidence" showed up to be false evidence.

Most people knew this. It was known that Iraq was weapon free. The UN inspections had shown that already beyond reasonable doubt.

The US had served the world badly by introducing inverse jurisdiction, it accuses and sentences a nation as guilty if that other nation can not proof the opposite.

In general one can not proof a negative. The accusing party has to proof a positive (the proof for the charges of which one is accused).
 
  • #3
hmmm, I'm not so sure how your post applies, but I do disagree that you cannot prove a negative.

You can prove a negative (assuming that you define a negative as a false idea) False ideas are negative, yes, but they have function and existence. By identifying these properties in a realm of 'rational discussion', i.e a rational enviroment, false ideas become exposed for being essentially what they are, art or image, not true and objective.

It is my hope and work that, with the help of the internet, we can create rational enviroments for world leaders to use to tap into the conflict of idea for mutual win foriegn policies.

OS 012 is the dialectic of 'how' to do that.

Moonrat
 
  • #4
A negative is something like this:

Can you proof that there is NOT a planet of the approx. size of the Earth in another solar system?

Since we can't currently measure/observe such small planets, only planets which are of size bigger then Jupiter, there is no way to proof that.
 
  • #5
heusdens said:
A negative is something like this:

Can you proof that there is NOT a planet of the approx. size of the Earth in another solar system?

Since we can't currently measure/observe such small planets, only planets which are of size bigger then Jupiter, there is no way to proof that.

My friend, using that kind of dialectic will not take you very far in understanding, for that is, by simple objective observation, NOT a negative but a MYSTERY.

and there is a distinction between a false idea and a mystery, and this is an important distinction to make, one in which OS 012 will help you see for yourself!

PEace

Moonrat
 

1. What is 012 ternary logic/dialectic?

012 ternary logic/dialectic is a type of logic that uses three truth values instead of the traditional two (true and false). The values used are 0, 1, and 2, where 0 represents false, 1 represents undetermined, and 2 represents true.

2. How is 012 ternary logic/dialectic different from traditional logic?

In traditional logic, statements are either true or false. In 012 ternary logic/dialectic, statements can also be undetermined, allowing for a more nuanced approach to reasoning and decision making.

3. What are the benefits of using 012 ternary logic/dialectic?

012 ternary logic/dialectic allows for a more comprehensive understanding of complex systems and situations. It also allows for uncertainty to be taken into account, leading to more accurate and realistic conclusions.

4. How is 012 ternary logic/dialectic used in real-world applications?

012 ternary logic/dialectic is used in various fields such as computer science, artificial intelligence, and decision-making processes. It can also be applied to ethical and moral dilemmas where there is no clear answer.

5. Can anyone learn and use 012 ternary logic/dialectic?

Yes, anyone can learn and use 012 ternary logic/dialectic. It requires an understanding of basic logic principles and some additional knowledge of ternary systems. With practice and application, anyone can become proficient in using 012 ternary logic/dialectic.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
825
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
19
Views
973
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top