1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

1+2+3+4... to infinity

  1. Nov 16, 2015 #1
    I watched a video where apparently the sum of all natural numbers = -1/12. The video starts by saying

    S = 1-1+1-1+1-1+1-1... to infinity. He then says this sum does not have an answer, it's constantly between 1 and 0 depending on where you stop it. So he just takes the average and says 1/2. How is this legit mathematics?

    6/0 does not have an answer so we can't just make one up and say oh let's just say it's 94 or something. The thing is it does actually = -1/12 but only if you assume the first part actually does = 1/2, which it doesn't, cos it doesn't have an answer -_-
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 16, 2015 #2

    Samy_A

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Well, it all depends on definitions.
    With the usual definition for convergence of series, saying that 1-1+1-1+1- ... equals 1/2 is of course nonsense.

    However, using the Cesàro summation, it is correct. :smile:
     
  4. Nov 16, 2015 #3

    Krylov

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    Exactly. A Belgian beat me to it. :wink:
     
  5. Nov 16, 2015 #4
    1 + 2 + 3 + ... does not equal -1/12. In fact, this is not a convergent series. (In other words its partial sums 1, 1+2, 1+2+3, 1+2+3+4,... do not approach a limit.)

    However, there are ways of taking the sequence of terms (1, 2, 3, ...) and using a "reasonable" method to come up with a real number.

    These are (finally!) discussed nicely in the Wikipedia article on the subject.

    For instance, one could notice that 1 + 2 + 3 + ... is just like the series

    1 + 1/2s + 1/3s + ..., ​

    which in fact does converge for s > 1, and is known as the (Dirichlet series for the) zeta function ζ(s) of s, when s is set equal to -1. Using the technique called analytic continuation, the zeta function
    ζ(s) is analytic on the entire complex plane ℂ with the sole exception of at the value s = 1, where it is not defined (because it has a pole).

    Specifically, 1 + 2 + 3 + ... is the Dirichlet series for zeta, BUT with the number -1 plugged in for the variable s. Although as we observed this does not converge, you could try an end run around this fact by simply plugging in -1 not to the Dirichlet series but instead to the zeta function. This might be a good time to stop and note the difference between these two things.

    Using this last idea, it so happens that at s = -1, the value of the zeta function ζ(-1) = -1/12.

    That is how the otherwise nonsensical equation

    1 + 2 + 3 + ... = -1/12 ​

    is "justified". (But in reality it is not justified, since it is untrue.)
     
  6. Nov 16, 2015 #5
    Similarly:
    Let S = 1+2+4+8+16+.....
    2S= 2+4+8+16+32+....
    So 2S= S-1
    S =-1
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: 1+2+3+4... to infinity
  1. 1-2+3-4+5 = 1/4 (Replies: 2)

  2. 1+2+3+4+ =-1/12? proof (Replies: 4)

Loading...