(1+x)^2/x^6 doesn't simplify?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplify
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
Ok I got an equation here...
[tex]2\sqrt {\frac{{(1 + 2t^4 )^2 }}{{t^6 }}}[/tex]
is the equation (sorry for misleading title but its the same concept).
Now I was always under the assumption that the top square could be removed as long as you reduce the bottom to [tex]t^3[/tex] since [tex]t^3[/tex] squared is [tex]t^6[/tex] and that you can cancel out squares like that. I guess I'm wrong? I'm running some examples in my mind and I'm kinda realizing you can't do it... but i feel like I've always thought it was true for soem reason.
I also did a simplification through mathematica and found out that the square root actually allows you to remove the [tex]^3[/tex] to get to the [tex]t^3[/tex].
The first question I'm asking is: without that square root... would I be able to simplify?
The 2nd question is exactly why I am able to use that square root to simplify. Sorry if its confusing...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you can get rid off the square root, since

[tex] \sqrt {\frac{{a^2 }}<br /> {{b^2 }}} = \sqrt {\left( {\frac{a}<br /> {b}} \right)^2 } = \left| {\frac{a}<br /> {b}} \right|[/tex]
 
Yah I was under the impression that even without that square root, it could turn into a/b
 
Just remember that the quantity has to remain positive. So the simplification of the original equation is:
[tex] |{1/t^3 + 2t}|[/tex]
 
If you want to see the reduction broken down then this is what you should do.
[tex]2\sqrt{\frac{(1+t^4)^2}{t^6}} =2\left(\frac{(1+t^4)^{2\frac{1}{2}}}{t^6}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}[/tex]
[tex]=2\frac{(1+t^4)^{2\frac{1}{2}}}{t^{6\frac{1}{2}}}=2\frac{1+t^4}{t^3}[/tex]
[tex]=2t^{-3}+2t^{-3+4}=|2(t^{-3}+t)|[/tex]

which almost yields the same result as knavish. I think he is missing a factor of 2 somewhere in there as

p.s. sorry I didn't break it down with the absolute value signs, but those were already explained pretty well... and for some reason I like to add them afterwards. bad habit i guess
 
Last edited: