- 14

- 1

I wasn't too sure where to post this, so I would like to apologies in advance in case it isn't the right place.

So I've made a little video a while ago and thought I could share it with out.

It's called 10 Questions for scientists and it relate to my curiosity about General science, (mostly physics)

I might not be able to understand the maths behind some of the subject, so if it's possible to explain them in details that would be appreciated

Here's the video, (escuse my broken English)

Here's the questions in text format.

**1: Black holes**

(if the size and mass isn’t right, feel free to use a different value)

My goal was to try to create an orbit very close to the Black hole but require a FTL speed to achieve a circular orbit.

According to the theory of Relativity it is not possible to get to the speed of light. which obviously, this orbit won’t be possible.

My question is what would happen to an object crossing that orbit?

would it accelerate to a point where it simply stop accelerating and don’t have enough speed to make the full orbit thus make it fall into the black hole?

Or is it by definition the point we call the Event horizon?

If so, Imagine small body such as as a spaceship orbiting at the Event horizon of a large black hole (big enough to prevent the spaghettification at this distance)

If that spaceship is at the exact point of the Event horizon. Let’s say it is halfway in the black hole. (Left side is in. Right side is out)

How would the crew experience it?

**2: the speed of light.**

Once again, in theory (and even in practice) Matter can’t reach the Speed of light nor go faster

My question relate more to the concept of acceleration.

If we have a space ship with infinite massless fuel and a powerful engine that is 100% efficient capable of giving a constant acceleration

What happens when it get near the speed of light?

If I remember right, the reason why we can’t get faster is due to the relativistic mass increasing which require more energy to push which then require an infinite amount of energy to pass the speed of light.

So if we have that space ship described above. how would the acceleration looks like (relative to the crew)?

Will slow down until it reach a critical point and completely stop accelerating?

or something else I just can’t figure out?

But then, when it reach it maximum speed.

What happen if you walk forward into that spaceship? would you go to a speed closer to the speed of light or you would it be physically impossible for you to walk?

**3: The Big Bang**

Is the Big Bang the known beginning of the Universe as a Whole or is it for the Observable Universe?

I’ve seen many people using it as if the Universe as a Whole was compressed into a single point. but it defy the idea that the Universe is infinite.

So when I look at it I see it in a slightly different way.

Basically, the Big bang would be the known beginning of the Universe as a Whole however it is by itself infinite in size so what we describe as the very compressed point is only the Observable universe. 13.82 Billion years ago.

I wanted to know if I made a mistake,If so, I wish to have more information about it as it can be confusing sometime.

**4: Entropy and the Universe**

I wonder how the laws of thermodynamics (especially entropy) apply when we deal with a Universe that is Infinite in size.

If the Universe wasn’t infinite then it would be easier to deal with the “border” and define a specific size so we can deal with it as being a Closed system.

However if the Universe is really Infinite, then how does Entropy works?

If the Universe is infinite, can it has an infinite amount of useable energy?

If so, how can it be affected by Entropy?

**5: Vacuumseption**

My question has more to do with the efficiency and structure of the vacuum itself.

If I remember right, the limit of most vacuum is caused by it composition.

Usually the cheap materials end up being crushed by the Earth atmosphere when we evacuate too much air.

So my question is:

What if we build a Vacuum inside a bigger vacuum?

The concept is to reduce the stress load to the vacuum inside in order to push its limit further. by creating a small vacuum around it.

For instance, let’s say I could reduce the pressure by 90% in the big Vacuum. Then the small inside could be used to reach an even lower pressure which would be far beyond it structural limit since it’s already in a vacuum thus it’s not subject to the stress.

I understand that It might not have any scientific value but can it be done for cheap?

**6: Planck length & Maths *Paradox**

If the Planck length is real and the physical limit (to our current understanding) What shall we do with the repeating decimal/periodic/irrational numbers? One example is Pi, Since the Planck length is about 1.6 x 10-35 metres, would there be any good reasons to keep counting down the decimal of Pi? or the Square root of 2?

What is the point to know the 100th digit of pi if the physical limit is the planck length?

*I called it a Paradox because it seems to be a contradiction between maths and physics.

It might not be the proper term to use though.*

**7: Simulated Universe *Paradox**

If we are within a Simulated Universe, then I believe that Everything, including our Laws of Physics are made up by this simulation. Therefore, The “computer” or whatever technology is used to create the Simulation we live in could run in a different world and have most likely a Different set of laws of physics.

If so, then we can not use our understanding of physics in order to prove the idea valid or even possible.

My best example is how we can run a simulation and change the value of different Physical constants such as gravity, which would result in an entirely different type of world.

Many people tries to prove this hypothesis by using our laws of physics as a stand point. For instance, If we were to find the “last” digit of Pi or the square root of 2, then it would be evidence in favour of the Simulated Universe as no computer can have infinite memory thus have a limit of informations thus creating that last digit.

But that only apply if that said Computer runs within our laws of physics.

Who knows?

Then we end up with the possibility that the World or Universe in which the Computer simulate our Universe could also be part of a Simulation…. that concept can go infinitely deep and there is no way to escape it.

*Once again, I called this a Paradox, however it might not be the proper use of the term. I used it because it reflect the paradoxical idea behind it.

**8: Dark Energy**

I understand that it is the force that drive the rapid expansion of the Universe. What I wonder is, does this Energy carry information? I understand that we can’t directly observe it. We can only approximate it effect via mathematical models of the Expansion of the Universe. But I’m curious about it.

**9: The Expansion of the Universe**

However I always wondered about it.

How did we calculated the expansion and the fact that it’s accelerating?

I understand that we have the Red Shift of the galaxies that shows that they are moving away, However, Since most of the things we see are billion years ago, does it mean that this expansion is about the same age? Could it have slowed down since then?

We barely watched this for the last 60 years or so, This is why I ask, Was it enough? and how much of an acceleration could we have measured within that time span? What is the maths behind it and how does it work?

To me, I feel like that we are still in a very young Universe where the expansion is still going on fast but will eventually slow down and collapse on itself.

Imagine the expansion of Gas a tenth of a second (or less) after the explosion of a kilo of TNT

It would surely look like it’s expanding and accelerating,

It might just be my biased opinion about the Big Crunch Scenario. I wish to be more enlightened about this.

**10: Nuke Jupiter**

Since Jupiter is mainly composed of Hydrogen, What kind of reaction should we expect if it was to happen?

Some people have described Jupiter as being a “Failed star”

Would it be possible to maintain a nuclear fusion for a period of time on jupiter by Blowing up nukes in it atmosphere?

I ask this question because the Bombs we have created reach the required temperature for fusion (obviously), I wonder what kind of reaction it would create when such thing happen in a dense Hydrogen atmosphere.

I wonder if the atmosphere itself will catch fire and maybe even create it own Storm.

If it can’t happen due to our lack of firepower, What kind of bomb would be required to create a visible mark in the atmosphere?

Then, what would it looks like if a Planet was to fall into Jupiter?

The energy would surely be incredible but would it be enough to achieve fusion?

(I do not mean to turn the whole planet into a small Star, but leave a mark big enough to be visible)

*Thank you for your time!*