11-D composite spacetime

In summary, your proposal suggests a composite network of different dimensional components, including interrelative time, as a possible explanation for the 7 compactified intradimensions and 4 exploded extradimensions of superstring theory. This could potentially provide new insights into the nature of time, space, and their relationship to each other.
  • #1
Loren Booda
3,125
4
Could the 7 compactified intradimensions and 4 exploded extradimensions of superstring theory alternately arise from a composite network of zero dimensional points, one dimensional strings, two dimensional branes, three dimensional volumes, four dimensional spaces, and an interrelative time of one dimension, such that: 0+1+2+3+4+1=11?

The 0,1,2,3,4 and |-1| components can replicate the dimensionality of strings or branes. By "interrelative" I mean that time, along with a 3-dimensional spatial geometry, can share the extradimensions as a continuous spacetime, whereas four dimensional spaces are restricted to compactification by both their Euclidean nature and maximal component 4-dimensionality. Each unit decrease in dimension would constitute a projection from the next higher component space. The lower compactified geometries would be projections both with and without time's arrow.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


I find this idea intriguing and worth exploring further. Superstring theory is a complex and fascinating concept that attempts to unify all the fundamental forces and particles in the universe. Your proposal of a composite network of different dimensional components is an interesting approach to understanding the structure of our universe.

One aspect that stands out to me is the idea of interrelative time. In traditional string theory, time is typically considered to be a separate dimension from space. However, your proposal suggests that time and space can share the extradimensions, creating a continuous spacetime. This could potentially provide a new perspective on the nature of time and its relationship to space.

Additionally, the concept of lower dimensional projections from higher dimensions is intriguing. It raises questions about the nature of these projections and how they could manifest in our observable universe. It would be interesting to explore the potential implications of this idea for our understanding of space and time.

However, as with any scientific theory, there would need to be evidence and mathematical models to support this concept. It would also be important to consider how this proposed framework fits into the existing body of knowledge in physics and how it can be tested and verified through experimentation.

Overall, your proposal presents an intriguing and thought-provoking perspective on the structure of our universe. It would be interesting to see how this idea develops and how it could potentially contribute to our understanding of superstring theory and the fundamental nature of our universe.
 
  • #3


This idea of a composite spacetime with varying dimensions is an interesting concept to consider. It is possible that the 11 dimensions of superstring theory could arise from a network of zero dimensional points, one dimensional strings, two dimensional branes, three dimensional volumes, and four dimensional spaces, all connected through a one dimensional interrelative time. The equation 0+1+2+3+4+1=11 suggests that each component contributes to the overall dimensionality of the composite spacetime.

The idea that time and spatial geometry can share the extradimensions as a continuous spacetime is intriguing. This could explain why time and space are intimately connected, and how they could both exist within the same extradimensions. The concept of lower compactified geometries being projections from higher dimensions also adds an interesting layer to this idea.

However, it is important to note that this is just a theoretical concept and there is currently no evidence to support it. Superstring theory itself is still a highly debated and unproven concept, so the idea of a composite spacetime based on it is even more speculative. It is possible that future research and advancements in physics may shed light on this idea, but for now it remains just a thought-provoking concept.
 

What is 11-D composite spacetime?

11-D composite spacetime is a theoretical concept in physics that combines the dimensions of space and time into an 11-dimensional framework. It is based on the idea that our universe may have more than the commonly known four dimensions (three spatial dimensions and one time dimension).

How is 11-D composite spacetime different from other theories?

11-D composite spacetime is different from other theories because it incorporates more dimensions than other theories, such as string theory which proposes 10 dimensions. It also allows for the unification of all fundamental forces, including gravity, which has not yet been achieved by other theories.

What is the significance of 11 dimensions in this theory?

The significance of 11 dimensions in this theory is that it allows for a more complete understanding of the universe and its fundamental forces. It also allows for the possibility of new phenomena and behaviors that cannot be explained by current theories.

How does 11-D composite spacetime impact our understanding of the universe?

11-D composite spacetime has the potential to greatly impact our understanding of the universe by providing a more comprehensive and unified framework. It may also lead to new discoveries and advancements in our understanding of fundamental forces and the nature of reality.

Is there any evidence to support the existence of 11-D composite spacetime?

At this time, there is no direct evidence to support the existence of 11-D composite spacetime. However, some theoretical models, such as M-theory, which incorporates 11 dimensions, have shown promise in providing a unified framework for understanding the universe. Further research and experimentation are needed to gather evidence and validate this theory.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
345
Back
Top