# 2 confusing exercises

1. Oct 8, 2009

### fawk3s

Hi

First of all I'd like to say that I dont want to put this under "Homework help", because its not really homework. But it is something I cant wrap my mind around. There are 2 tasks:

1) There's 200 cm3 water in a glass. How high does the water level rise / how much does the cubage change, if you put a body with 40g to FLOAT in it?

Now it is solved by simply giving the body the density of the water.. But how the heck can you do that? It is said that the body floats, not swims/hovers/whatever.

To clear things up, this is how I understand it. My english is not so good so i dont know which is which:
float - Fgravity<Fbouyancy
swim - Fgravity=Fbouyancy
sink - Fgravity>Fbouyancy

2) A ship's and its stuff's total mass is 4000t=4000000kg. What is the cubage of the part of the ship which is under water? (Assuming the density of the water is 1030kg/m3, like in the sea).

I think the answer is supposed to be ~3883 m3, which you can get simply by 4000000/1030, but why and how does this give you the answer?

These are pretty elementary questions, but Im stupid, I know. No need to tell me that.
I appreaciate any help.

fawk3s

2. Oct 8, 2009

### sophiecentaur

I think it's best to work on the principle that a floating object displaces it's own weight of fluid.
As long as you can sort out the units ( weight and mass) appropriately, that will give you the answer to all these types of problems.

3. Oct 9, 2009

### fawk3s

I dont.. follow. :D

4. Oct 9, 2009

### sophiecentaur

If you know the mass of the object then you will know the weight (from local g knowledge).
That will be balanced by an upthrust due to an equal weight of displaced fluid. That's good ol' Archimedes' principle. Knowing the weight can then give the volume displaced (via the Mass).
I'm being pernickety about the weight - mass thing so that you can be sure of getting the right answer.

5. Oct 9, 2009

### fawk3s

I still dont understand. Where do you get the weight of the displaced fluid? You dont have the density nor the volume of the body.

Last edited: Oct 9, 2009
6. Oct 9, 2009

### PhyGuru

You are missing the point, the thing is you don't have to know the density of the object that is (swimming/floating) The point is the object (ship) is imparting its weight on the water moving away (displacing) that much amount (weight of water). You can arrive at the volume of the displaced water as you know the water's density. Voila! that's the volume of the ship that is immersed in water.

7. Oct 9, 2009

### fawk3s

You are taking the objects weight as the weight of the displaced water? This is what confuses me!

Logic tells me that if you put a 5m3 body in a certain amount of water, the displaced fluids volume would be 5m3.
So lets say you have a body of 5m3 (cubemeter) and its made of iron (7800kg/m3). So its mass is m=5*7800=39000kg, therefore, weight=9.8*39000=382200N.
So lets say the displaced waters weight is also 382200N, therefore mass=382200/9.8=39000. And therefore, the volume would be 39000/1000=39m3.

8. Oct 9, 2009

### PhyGuru

You are looking at the principle of buyoncy, the initial condition is that the object is floating/swimming, density of object <= density of fluid.

In th other case (iron block) when it sinks, density > density of fluid.

9. Oct 9, 2009

### fawk3s

How do you get the weight of the displaced water...? This is what I asked. And this would tell me how to solve the problems.

Last edited: Oct 9, 2009
10. Oct 9, 2009

### PhyGuru

if the object is floating (DensityObj <= DensityFluid):

Weight of displaced water = weight of the object

Else

Weight of displaced water = volume of the submerged portion of object * Density of water

11. Oct 9, 2009

### fawk3s

How can you say that?

if DensityObj <= DensityFluid
then it MUST be
weight of displaced water <= weight of the object.

But that does not give me anything! I cant calculate it!
If you cant tell me how to calculate the weight of the displaced water, or solve the problem, then there is no point in posting the density-crap I already know about.

12. Oct 9, 2009

### PhyGuru

Without involving density...

Any object, wholly or partly immersed in a fluid, is buoyed up by a force equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the object.

Greater the volume of the displaced fluid, greather is the force.

If this force is greater than the weight of the object, it takes it up to the surface until the two forces balance each other out.

That's where the
Weight of displaced water = weight of the object

comes from, a perfect cancellation of 2 forces.

13. Oct 9, 2009

### sophiecentaur

The point is that whatever the density of the object it will sink until it displaces enough water to make it float (assming it doesn't sink of course). An object made of heavy wood (just floating) will displace the same amount ( weight or volume) of water as inflatable boat of negligable mass carrying the same object.
The upthrust is just enough to make it float and is there because of the water that has been pushed out of the way. In both cases that will be the same amount but the lump of wood will be mostly above the water surface in the second case. OR a huge block of foam, weighing the same would be almost all out of the water but still displaces the same amount of water.
I know I'm just repeating myself in essence but I'm putting it in practical terms this time.

14. Oct 10, 2009

### fawk3s

Oh god what have I written last night..
If the object is floating/swimming, the weight is the same as the displaced waters !! And the volume is only the same with the body's when the object has sinked ! HOW DID I NOT SEE THAT?!

I just discovered Im a retard.
But big thanks guys, I get it now! And thanks for your patience!