2D Moment Equilibrium Question

  • Thread starter Melawrghk
  • Start date
  • #1
145
0

Homework Statement


A speaker system is suspended by the cables attached at and . The mass of the speaker system is 92.5kg, and its weight acts at G. Determine the tensions in the cables hanging from (a)D and (b)E .

2Deqm.jpg


Homework Equations


[tex]\sum[/tex]M=0
[tex]\sum[/tex]F=0


The Attempt at a Solution


First, I decided to find reactions at C. I drew the arrows on the diagram, where the horizontal one going to C is Cx and vertical one is Cy. Vertical arrow pointing to A will be further referred to as Ay.
So I got:
Mc=Mcdue to A+Mcdue to G=0
Mcdue to A=92.5*9.81*1.5
Ay * 1 = 1361.14N
Since the moment is positive, Ay has to be pointing downwards
Thus Ay (vector)=-1361.14N. From this, we can find Cy:
[tex]\sum[/tex]Fy = -1361.14N+Cy-907.425N=0
so Cy=2269
There are no x-direction forces, so Cx=0

Now that we know reactions at C, we can "cut" the cables (E&D) and find E using moment around D:
MD=+(1.5)*(1361.14)-2269*(.5)-(1)(0) - E*1.5=0
From which E (vector)=-604.81

Then we can use E, to find D:
Sum of Fy = -1361.14+2269-604.81+D=0
D=-303.05

Is that right? Or have I made some wrong assumptions?
Also, I got negative numbers for E and D because they're forces that are acting down. But how would I put in the answer? Tension should be positive 'cause it's just a magnitude, right?
Thanks!
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
PhanthomJay
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
7,167
507
Your results look good, however, if you are just looking for the cable tensions, you could have saved yourself some time by just isolating the speaker by cutting the cables E and D, and solved for the tensions without looking at the frame at all. Your negative sign means that the cable forces (tensions) act down , pulling away from the beam, as they must. If you did the FBD of the speaker, the tension values would be positive, i.e., acting up, pulling away from the speaker, as they must.
 
  • #3
145
0
Great! Thank you, I see what you mean... Next time I'll be sure to use the shorter version :)
 

Related Threads on 2D Moment Equilibrium Question

  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
995
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
8K
Top