• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

2D reciprocal lattice vectors

  • Thread starter jonesj314
  • Start date
  • #1
5
0

Homework Statement



Si(001) has the following lattice vectors in a (2x1) reconstruction [tex] \vec{a'_1} = \vec{a_1} + \vec{a_2} [/tex] [tex] \vec{a'_2} = -0.5 \vec{a_1} + 0.5 \vec{a_2} [/tex]

Calculate the reciprocal lattice vectors of the reconstructed unit cell, [itex] \vec{b'_1} [/itex] and [itex] \vec{b'_2} [/itex] in terms of [itex] \vec{a_1} [/itex] and [itex] \vec{a_2} [/itex].


Homework Equations



I have been using the formulae for finding reciprocal lattice vectors in 3D, i.e

[tex] \vec{b'_1} = 2 π \frac{(\vec{a'_2} ×\vec{a'_3})}{\vec{a'_1}. (\vec{a'_2} × \vec{a'_3})}[/tex]

and the usual permutations for the other 2 reciprocal vectors

The Attempt at a Solution



Since I'm trying to do this for a 2D lattice I'm running into problems. If I treat [itex] \vec{a'_3} [/itex] as simply being the z unit vector, then i find the numerator to be [itex] \vec{b'_1} = 2π (0.5 \vec{a_1} - 0.5 \vec{a_2}) [/itex] is this correct for the numerator?? (it's orthogonal to [itex] \vec{a'_2} [/itex] as I was expecting)

however, using this method I find the denominator to be zero since,

[tex] \vec{a'_1}. (\vec{a'_2} × \vec{a'_3}) = (\vec{a_1} + \vec{a_2}) . (0.5\vec{a_1} - 0.5\vec{a_2} ) [/tex]

and this dot product equals zero.

What am I doing wrong? Any help appreciated
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
UltrafastPED
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,912
216
I get [itex] \vec{b'_1} = 2π (0.5 \vec{a_1} + 0.5 \vec{a_2}) [/itex]


And permuting the terms in the triple product try (a1' x a2')°a3'; but the cross product is parallel to a3' (which is OK, 'cause it is a dot product), and a3' is a unit vector so the volume is just |a1' x a2'|= area of the parallelogram with sides a1', a2'.
 
  • Like
Likes Tiantian
  • #3
5
0
Hi, thanks for the reply. You're right, I evaluated the numerator incorrectly.

I still don't understand the significance of the denominator. Why do I get zero? Would permuting the triple product to the form you suggest give a different answer?
Quite confused as to what this should be.
 
  • #4
UltrafastPED
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,912
216
It gives the same answer: I just shifted the form to make the result obvious, and simple to compute. Your product a2' x a3' is incorrect ... same error as with b1.

The magnitude is 1.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #5
5
0
oh of course :) thank you! All makes sense now
 

Related Threads on 2D reciprocal lattice vectors

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
17K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
411
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
697
Replies
16
Views
151
Replies
0
Views
235
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Top