Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

2nd fundamental theorem of calculus

  1. Apr 26, 2004 #1
    Can some on pleases explain this too me. I have an AP book, and i am to do a few problems out of it for class, and but cant find it in there ANY WHERE. Any help would be superb!
    -Jacob
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 26, 2004 #2

    pig

    User Avatar

    Mathworld says:

    http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SecondFundamentalTheoremofCalculus.html

    In my book, this is simply called "the fundamental theorem of calculus", and mathworld's first t. of c. is mentioned later than this, so I can understand your confusion.
     
  4. Apr 26, 2004 #3
    Finney's book has this backwards... The second F of C is the Integral Evaluation Theorem... Which is the mathworld's 1st...

    Its hand stuff!
     
  5. Apr 26, 2004 #4

    Math Is Hard

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I've seen it both ways in several books. Luckily, no teacher has ever asked me to state FTC #1 or state FTC #2, they've only asked me to be able to use them.
    Did you try any of the problems yet?
     
  6. Apr 26, 2004 #5
    Do you need to understand the proofs? Or just understand the idea?

    FTC#2 says
    [itex] \int^b_a f(x)dx = F(b) - F(a) [/itex]

    where the anti-derivative of f(x) is F(x)

    So what you are probably using this Thrm for is evaluating definite integrals (ones with A and B stated).

    So what you do is find the anti-derivative of f(x) i.e. F(x), and then evaluate that anti-derivative at a and b, then take the absolute value of their difference.

    For example if we wanted to evaluate:

    [itex] \int^5_1 3x^2dx [/itex]

    we would first find the anti derivative of 3x^2.

    Which is x^3.

    Then we would evaluate x^3 at 1 and 5 which gives us, 1 and 125. We subtract 1 from 125 and get 124, hence:

    [itex] \int^5_1 3x^2dx = 124[/itex]
     
  7. Apr 26, 2004 #6
    thanx you guys. I know how to do those with my eyes closed, its just that my AP book has a real habit of doing things w/o thouroughly explaining them. thanx again ill tell my friends about this site!
    -Jacob
     
  8. Sep 21, 2004 #7

    mathwonk

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    2015 Award

    2nd FTC: If f is any riemann integrable function on the closed bounded interval [a,b], and G is a Lipschitz - continuous function such that for every point x where f is continuous, G is diiferentiable at x with G'(x) = f(x), then the integral of f from a to b, equals G(b)-G(a).

    Recall that G is lipschitz continuous on [a,b] if there exists a constant K such that for all points u,v in [a,b] we have |G(v) - G(u)| <= K|v-u|.
     
  9. Sep 22, 2004 #8

    JasonRox

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Is the first theorem just:

    y=x^n
    dy/dx=nx^n-1

    Is that it?

    I wrote general proof for the derivative of a function x^n. Using limits of course, and I ended with nx^n-1, which is what you are suppose to get.

    I never seen the proof yet, and it would be great to do it independently.

    So, what is the 1st Fundamental Theorem(in most books)?
     
  10. Sep 22, 2004 #9

    mathwonk

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    2015 Award

    in most books it says that if f is continuous on [a,b] and G(x) is the integral of f from a to x, then G is differentiable on [a,b] and G'(x) = f(x) for every x in [a,b].

    The more general statement is that if f is a Riemann integrable function on [a,b] and G(x) again is the injtegral of f from a to x, then G is Lipschitz continuous, and G is differentiable with G'(x) = f(x) at those points where f is continuous.

    Then to derive the 2nd thm from the first you need the generalized mean value theorem, that a function G which is lipschitz continuous and has derivative equal to zero almost everywhere (i.e. except on a set of measure zero) is constant.

    in most books the 2nd thm just says that if f is continuous on [a,b] and G is continuous on [a,b] with G'(x) = f(x) for all x in (a,b), then the integral of f from a to b, equals G(b)-G(a).
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2004
  11. Sep 23, 2004 #10

    JasonRox

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The Riemann Sum?

    You can find the value under a curse with it.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Similar Discussions: 2nd fundamental theorem of calculus
Loading...