I've been given a 2nd ODE in the form(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

y'' + p(x)y' + q(x)y = 0

The equation does not satisfy the test for a unique solution at x_0 = 0, because p and q are not continuous at x_0 (both p and q have x in the denominator, so a value of 0 makes the function discontinuous).

I've two questions.

1) If the uniqueness-existence theorem is not satisfied, can I conclude that the theorem does not guarantee a unique solution, but failure of the test does not exclude there being a unique solution? I.e. a unique solution is possible, but its existence cannot be predicted using the theorem.

2) I've found a general solution to the 2nd ODE of

y_h = c_1*f(x) + c_2*g(x)

I'm given initial conditions of y(0) =0 and y'(0) = 1.

using these values, I get c_2 = 4c_1 - 4.

The other equation I obtain cancels to 0 = 0

From this, can I conclude that no unique solution exists (for those initial values) to the 2nd ODE, since I'm not able to obtain unique values for c_1 and c_2 ?

Thanks

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# 2nd ODE, unique solutions

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**