Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Stargazing 30X telescope use

Tags:
  1. Jun 9, 2012 #1
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 9, 2012 #2

    Bobbywhy

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Before you pay for that Tasco telescoope, may I suggest you read the "Important. Planning to buy first telescope?" in this subforum. (Look just above your post) This is a great place to get consumer reports on telescopes.

    I have used that same Tasco you linked to. It was so unstable that looking at a star cluster was out of the question. The moon's details were blurred, and, in the daytime, even a nearby bird was hard to see. My personal opinion is "don't buy that one".

    Also, check out this link:
    http://www.skyandtelescope.com/equipment/basics
     
  4. Jun 9, 2012 #3

    Drakkith

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That telescope is about right for the price, which is less than $10 if I'm reading the page correctly. Remember the phrase, "You get what you pay for".
     
  5. Jun 10, 2012 #4

    Bobbywhy

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    OOPS! I misread the price at the website and mis-took Rupees for dollars! Excuse me, please! For that price of less than TEN DOLLARS I would then say: Yes, buy that telescope!
     
  6. Jun 10, 2012 #5

    Chronos

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Buying optics like this one is guaranteed to be disappointing at any price. A nice 8 x 50 binocular will be much more pleasurable, and you will probably keep it for years. The milky way viewed through these can be breathtaking.
     
  7. Jun 11, 2012 #6
    The problem with owning a small telescope is so many photographs of astronomical objects are published taken with 10 meter telescopes with adaptive optics on mountain tops that one tends to be dissapointed that ones own views are nothing like as good so dont expect too much !
     
  8. Jun 11, 2012 #7
    thanks for the replies... i think the magnification factor isn't that bad but objective lens aperture is too small to allow much of light to enter.. :(
     
  9. Jun 11, 2012 #8

    Drakkith

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That plus it's not big enough to even allow for a decent zoom. The larger the aperture the further you can zoom in before you hit the diffraction limit. Once you hit the limit further magnification does nothing but make a bigger blurry image.
     
  10. Jun 11, 2012 #9

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    I think every one should understand that for astronomical use, diameter of objective lens or mirror is far more important that magnification. Indeed, typically, one uses a variety of eyepieces with different focal lengths that give different magnifications.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook